Federal Arbitration Act Grounds For Appeal Of Award In Oakland
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Once an arbitrator issues an award, either an agency or a union may appeal the arbitrator's award by filing an "exception" with the Authority within 30 days after the date on which the Arbitrator served the award on the parties.
The appeal must be commenced within thirty (30) days of the date on which the original award is submitted to the parties and only on the grounds that the original award is based upon “(1) an error of law that is material and prejudicial; or (2) determinations of fact that are clearly erroneous.”11 AAA will then arrange ...
Procedure for Appeal To initiate an appeal, the party must file an appeal notice in the court within 28 days of the award being made. The appeal notice must include the grounds for appeal and the relief sought. The party must also serve a copy of the appeal notice on the other party.
If a party to an arbitration wishes to challenge an award for any reason, they need to make an application to a court except in the rare case where the parties' agreement provides for some type of appellate proceeding within the arbitration.
Under the Federal Arbitration Act, which governs most arbitrations, a party may petition a court to modify or vacate an arbitration award, but the grounds are extremely narrow — basically that the arbitrator was corrupt, evidently partial, engaged in misconduct regarding evidence or scheduling, or exceeded his or her ...
The answer is yes, through a process called vacatur, i.e., having the award vacated or canceled. The vacatur process is set forth in two statutes: the Federal Arbitration Act and the applicable state arbitration act governing the dispute. Depending on the case, one or both statutes may be applicable.
The grounds for attacking an arbitration award under common law are listed; they include fraud, misconduct, and gross unfairness by the arbitrator.
The merits of the dispute are not considered and the award can only be vacated where: (1) the award was procured by fraud or corruption; (2) there was corruption in the arbitrator; (3) the arbitrator committed misconduct resulting in substantial prejudice; (4) the arbitrators exceeded their powers; (5) the arbitrator ...