David John Fulton appeals from the final decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirming the rejection of certain claims in U.S. Patent Application No. The court affirmed the Board's determination that Fulton's patent application for shoe soles with increased traction was obvious.The key to supporting any rejection under 35 USC 103 is the clear articulation of the reason(s) why the claimed invention would have been obvious. North Carolina's intangibles tax discriminates against interstate commerce in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause. Appellants Daniel Fulton and James Huang appeal from the decision of the US Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. I'm a problem solver. If there's an elegant (aka simple) solution to something, I'll find it. Use the Inventors link below to see if you qualify for our program and apply. We'll search for a qualified patent agent or attorney that is right for you. In the tools section of this tutorial, you will find a sample USPTO Application.