This form is a sample motion used in an attempt to quash a deposition subpoena duces tecum.
Hawaii Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Duces Tecum
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-PI-0042
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
A subpoena may also command the person to whom it is directed to produce the books, papers, documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things designated therein; but the court, upon motion made promptly and in any event at or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance therewith, may (1) ...
Time to Object Under FRCP 45(d)(2)(B) Absent an agreement or court order stating otherwise, a subpoena recipient must serve any written objections on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena before the earlier of: The subpoena's return date (which issuing counsel sets). 14 days after the subpoena is served.
Common grounds for objecting to a third-party subpoena for documents include: Improper service. Improper issuance. Vague, ambiguous, and unreasonable requests. Insufficient time to reply. Disclosure of privileged or confidential information. Disclosure of trade secrets. Undue burden or expense. Inaccessible data.
Common grounds for objecting to a third-party subpoena for documents include: Improper service. Improper issuance. Vague, ambiguous, and unreasonable requests. Insufficient time to reply.
Failure to respond to a subpoena is punishable as contempt by either the court or agency issuing the subpoena. Punishment may include monetary sanctions (even imprisonment although extremely unlikely).
A court might, upon a proper motion, quash a subpoena duces tecum if the agency did not have the power to issue the subpoena, the materials sought are not relevant to an authorized investigation, and the items sought are not described with particularity and definiteness, as required by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. ...
A Deposition Subpoena differs from the Subpoena DucesTecum in that the documents and testimony requested are part of the ?discovery process? before trial and may not be used in an actual court hearing.
A court might, upon a proper motion, quash a subpoena duces tecum if the agency did not have the power to issue the subpoena, the materials sought are not relevant to an authorized investigation, and the items sought are not described with particularity and definiteness, as required by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. ...
