In a deed, a grantee may agree to do something or refrain from doing certain acts. This agreement will become a binding contract between the grantor and the grantee. An example would be an agreement to maintain fences on the property or that the property will only be used for residential purposes. This kind of covenant is binding, not only between the grantor and the grantee, but also runs with the land. This means that anyone acquiring the land from the grantee is also bound by the covenant of the grantee. A covenant that provides that the grantee will refrain from certain conduct is called a restrictive or protective covenant. For example, there may be a covenant that no mobile home shall be placed on the property.
A restrictive or protective covenant may limit the kind of structure that can be placed on the property and may also restrict the use that can be made of the land. For example, when a tract of land is developed for individual lots and homes to be built, it is common to use the same restrictive covenants in all of the deeds in order to cause uniform restrictions and patterns on the property. For example, the developer may provide that no home may be built under a certain number of square feet. Any person acquiring a lot within the tract will be bound by the restrictions if they are placed in the deed or a prior recorded deed. Also, these restrictive covenants may be placed in a document at the outset of the development entitled "Restrictive Covenants," and list all the restrictive covenants that will apply to the tracts of land being developed. Any subsequent deed can then refer back to the book and page number where these restrictive covenants are recorded. Any person owning one of the lots in the tract may bring suit against another lot owner to enforce the restrictive covenants. However, restrictive covenants may be abandoned or not enforceable by estoppel if the restrictive covenants are violated openly for a sufficient period of time in order for a Court to declare that the restriction has been abandoned.
Oklahoma Agreement Creating Restrictive Covenants
Instant download
Description
Free preview
How to fill out Agreement Creating Restrictive Covenants?
If you are looking to finalize, retrieve, or print valid document templates, utilize US Legal Forms, the largest selection of official forms available online.
Make use of the website's straightforward and convenient search feature to find the documents you require.
Various templates for professional and personal uses are organized by categories and states, or keywords.
Step 4. Once you have identified the form you need, click the Buy now button. Choose the pricing plan you prefer and enter your information to register for an account.
Step 5. Proceed with the purchase. You may use your Visa or Mastercard or PayPal account to complete the transaction.
- Use US Legal Forms to access the Oklahoma Agreement Establishing Restrictive Covenants in just a few clicks.
- If you are an existing US Legal Forms user, Log In to your account and click the Obtain button to get the Oklahoma Agreement Establishing Restrictive Covenants.
- You can also find forms you have previously acquired in the My documents section of your account.
- If you are using US Legal Forms for the first time, please follow the instructions below.
- Step 1. Ensure you have chosen the form for the appropriate city/state.
- Step 2. Utilize the Review feature to scrutinize the form's content. Don’t forget to read the description.
- Step 3. If you are not satisfied with the form, use the Search bar at the top of the page to find other variations of the legal form template.
Form popularity
FAQ
If there is a restrictive covenant on your property you may be able to remove it. The first step would be to negotiate with the original developer or landowner to enter into a formal agreement to remove the covenants from the title.
How legally binding are restrictive covenants? Providing restrictive covenants are not void for restraint of trade and required to protect legitimate business interests, they will be viewed as legally binding. If restrictive covenants are introduced to existing employees, employer's need to provide consideration.
A restrictive covenant is a condition that restricts, limits, prohibits, or prevents the actions of someone named in an enforceable agreement. In bond obligations, restrictive covenants limit the amount issuers can pay in dividends to investors.
Breaching a restrictive covenant leaves you open to potential legal action from the other party, if they wish to enforce the covenant. If you are taken to court and the other party is successful, you might have to undo any work carried out and may face a fine or have to pay damages, as well as legal fees.
Are covenants legally enforceable? Restrictive covenants are usually legally enforceable and binding if they have been set up properly, but can cease to be enforceable after a period of time in some circumstances.
A restrictive covenant may include things that you can't do with your property, like raise livestock. A restrictive covenant will also include things that you must do, like mow your lawn regularly. The specific restrictive covenants you need to follow will vary depending on where you live.
Non-compete clauses and restrictive covenants are highly enforceable in the UK in order to protect the business the employee is leaving. They have to be narrowly defined and should only stay enforced for the time that is required to protect the business.
Creating a CovenantA covenant can be created by separate deed (a Deed of Covenant). The deed will need to be protected by the entry of a notice on the register of title and needs to be signed by the covenantor though not necessarily by the covenantee.
If there is a restrictive covenant on your property you may be able to remove it. The first step would be to negotiate with the original developer or landowner to enter into a formal agreement to remove the covenants from the title.
Requirements in US LawThe covenant must be in writing to satisfy the Statute of Frauds. The original parties to the agreement must have intended that successors be bound by the agreement.