Impeachment of Witnesses because of Inconsistent Statement or Felony Conviction (Defendant with Felony Conviction Testifies)

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - 11th Circuit - Criminal
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-JURY-11THCIR-B6-6-CR
• Format: Word

Description

Pattern Jury Instructions from the 11th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals. For more information and to use the online Instruction builder please visit http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/pattern-jury-instructions Impeachment of Witnesses because of Inconsistent Statement or Felony Conviction (Defendant with Felony Conviction Testifies) is a legal process in which a witness’s credibility is challenged in a court of law. This is typically done if a witness has made inconsistent statements, or has been convicted of a felony. In the case of a defendant with a felony conviction testifying, the court may choose to impeach the witness based on their criminal past. There are two main types of impeachment of witnesses because of inconsistent statement or felony conviction (defendant with felony conviction testifies). The first is direct impeachment, which is when the court directly questions the witness about their criminal conviction. This is done to demonstrate to the jury that the witness is not credible due to their past. The second type is indirect impeachment, which is when the court brings in evidence of the witness’s criminal history without directly asking the witness about it. This is done to show the jury that the witness’s credibility is questionable. In either case, the court must demonstrate that the witness’s credibility is in question due to their criminal history. The court must also show that the testimony of the witness is not reliable due to their past. If the court is able to successfully impeach the witness, the testimony of the witness may be disregarded by the jury.

Impeachment of Witnesses because of Inconsistent Statement or Felony Conviction (Defendant with Felony Conviction Testifies) is a legal process in which a witness’s credibility is challenged in a court of law. This is typically done if a witness has made inconsistent statements, or has been convicted of a felony. In the case of a defendant with a felony conviction testifying, the court may choose to impeach the witness based on their criminal past. There are two main types of impeachment of witnesses because of inconsistent statement or felony conviction (defendant with felony conviction testifies). The first is direct impeachment, which is when the court directly questions the witness about their criminal conviction. This is done to demonstrate to the jury that the witness is not credible due to their past. The second type is indirect impeachment, which is when the court brings in evidence of the witness’s criminal history without directly asking the witness about it. This is done to show the jury that the witness’s credibility is questionable. In either case, the court must demonstrate that the witness’s credibility is in question due to their criminal history. The court must also show that the testimony of the witness is not reliable due to their past. If the court is able to successfully impeach the witness, the testimony of the witness may be disregarded by the jury.