Title: Understanding North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check — Civil and Criminal Cases Introduction: When a check is returned unpaid by the bank due to insufficient funds, it is considered a dishonored or bounced check. In North Charleston, South Carolina, dishonored checks can lead to both civil and criminal consequences. This detailed description will explain the specifics of a North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check, highlighting the distinction between civil and criminal cases. Key terms such as bad check and bounced check will also be incorporated to enhance relevance. I. Civil Cases: 1. North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check (Civil): Introduction In civil cases, a North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check serves as a formal notification sent by the payee or their representative to the check-writer. This document alerts them to the dishonored check, providing an opportunity to address the issue without involving law enforcement agencies. 2. Understanding a Bad Check in Civil Cases: A bad check is a term often used interchangeably with a dishonored check. It refers to a check that cannot be accepted or cashed due to various reasons such as insufficient funds, account closure, or a mismatched signature. When a bad check is issued, the recipient has the right to pursue civil actions against the check-writer. 3. Procedures in Civil Cases: After receiving a North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check, the check-writer typically has a limited timeframe to rectify the situation. This may involve paying the amount owed, including any bank fees or additional charges incurred as a result of the bounced check. Resolving the issue promptly can prevent further legal action. II. Criminal Cases: 1. North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check (Criminal): Introduction In criminal cases, a North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check represents a more severe consequence for the check-writer. This notice is initiated by the recipient and involves law enforcement agencies to pursue legal actions against the defaulter. 2. Bounced Check in Criminal Cases: A bounced check refers specifically to a dishonored check that triggers criminal consequences. It involves a deliberate act of knowingly writing a check with insufficient funds or a closed account, intending to defraud the recipient. Bounced checks in criminal cases are considered fraudulent or deceptive practices. 3. Criminal Penalties for Writing a Bounced Check: Receiving a North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check (Criminal) can result in serious legal ramifications. It could lead to criminal charges, fines, probation, or even imprisonment, depending on the severity of the case and the check amount. Conclusion: A North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check is an important legal document that can have both civil and criminal implications for the check-writer. Understanding the distinction between civil and criminal cases when dealing with a bad or bounced check is crucial. Avoiding such situations by ensuring sufficient funds and proper transactions is the best way to prevent the issuance of a notice of dishonored check and its associated consequences.
Para su conveniencia, debajo del texto en español le brindamos la versión completa de este formulario en inglés. For your convenience, the complete English version of this form is attached below the Spanish version.We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience, enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy. By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Read more
- US Legal Forms
- Localized forms in Spanish
- South Carolina
- North Charleston
-
South Carolina Aviso de cheque sin fondos - Civil y Penal - Palabras...
North Charleston South Carolina Aviso de cheque sin fondos - Civil y Penal - Palabras clave: cheque sin fondos, cheque sin fondos - South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check - Civil and Criminal - Keywords: bad check, bounced check
State:
South Carolina
City:
North Charleston
Control #:
SC-401N
Format:
Word
Instant download
Description
Formulario de aviso de cheque sin fondos.
Title: Understanding North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check — Civil and Criminal Cases Introduction: When a check is returned unpaid by the bank due to insufficient funds, it is considered a dishonored or bounced check. In North Charleston, South Carolina, dishonored checks can lead to both civil and criminal consequences. This detailed description will explain the specifics of a North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check, highlighting the distinction between civil and criminal cases. Key terms such as bad check and bounced check will also be incorporated to enhance relevance. I. Civil Cases: 1. North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check (Civil): Introduction In civil cases, a North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check serves as a formal notification sent by the payee or their representative to the check-writer. This document alerts them to the dishonored check, providing an opportunity to address the issue without involving law enforcement agencies. 2. Understanding a Bad Check in Civil Cases: A bad check is a term often used interchangeably with a dishonored check. It refers to a check that cannot be accepted or cashed due to various reasons such as insufficient funds, account closure, or a mismatched signature. When a bad check is issued, the recipient has the right to pursue civil actions against the check-writer. 3. Procedures in Civil Cases: After receiving a North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check, the check-writer typically has a limited timeframe to rectify the situation. This may involve paying the amount owed, including any bank fees or additional charges incurred as a result of the bounced check. Resolving the issue promptly can prevent further legal action. II. Criminal Cases: 1. North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check (Criminal): Introduction In criminal cases, a North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check represents a more severe consequence for the check-writer. This notice is initiated by the recipient and involves law enforcement agencies to pursue legal actions against the defaulter. 2. Bounced Check in Criminal Cases: A bounced check refers specifically to a dishonored check that triggers criminal consequences. It involves a deliberate act of knowingly writing a check with insufficient funds or a closed account, intending to defraud the recipient. Bounced checks in criminal cases are considered fraudulent or deceptive practices. 3. Criminal Penalties for Writing a Bounced Check: Receiving a North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check (Criminal) can result in serious legal ramifications. It could lead to criminal charges, fines, probation, or even imprisonment, depending on the severity of the case and the check amount. Conclusion: A North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check is an important legal document that can have both civil and criminal implications for the check-writer. Understanding the distinction between civil and criminal cases when dealing with a bad or bounced check is crucial. Avoiding such situations by ensuring sufficient funds and proper transactions is the best way to prevent the issuance of a notice of dishonored check and its associated consequences.
Related forms
Related legal definitions
Viewed forms
Acuerdo entre propietarios colindantes con...
Acuerdo entre propietarios colindantes con respecto a la invasión de un edificio
View this form
Contrapropuesta a Contrato de Compraventa ...
Contrapropuesta a Contrato de Compraventa de Bienes Inmuebles
View this form
Equal Employment Opportunity Package
Equal Employment Opportunity Package
View this form
How to fill out North Charleston South Carolina Aviso De Cheque Sin Fondos - Civil Y Penal - Palabras Clave: Cheque Sin Fondos, Cheque Sin Fondos?
If you’ve already utilized our service before, log in to your account and save the North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check - Civil and Criminal - Keywords: bad check, bounced check on your device by clicking the Download button. Make sure your subscription is valid. Otherwise, renew it according to your payment plan.
If this is your first experience with our service, adhere to these simple steps to get your file:
- Ensure you’ve located an appropriate document. Look through the description and use the Preview option, if any, to check if it meets your requirements. If it doesn’t fit you, use the Search tab above to find the appropriate one.
- Buy the template. Click the Buy Now button and select a monthly or annual subscription plan.
- Register an account and make a payment. Utilize your credit card details or the PayPal option to complete the transaction.
- Get your North Charleston South Carolina Notice of Dishonored Check - Civil and Criminal - Keywords: bad check, bounced check. Pick the file format for your document and save it to your device.
- Fill out your sample. Print it out or take advantage of professional online editors to fill it out and sign it electronically.
You have permanent access to every piece of paperwork you have purchased: you can find it in your profile within the My Forms menu anytime you need to reuse it again. Take advantage of the US Legal Forms service to quickly find and save any template for your individual or professional needs!
Form Rating
4.68
Satisfied(496)
Form popularity
More info
Media Mention, The Charleston Post and Courier, WLTX Columbia, WBTV Florence, WJBF Augusta, WSPA Spartanburg, WCBD Charleston, and WSAV Savannah. Return to Grade 7 Social Studies: How to Navigate This Document. 1.And so when he finally got the check, he had to pay taxes out of that money because it's considered business income. "We had 7 years where we made no. Please check out the full line-up of client offerings on uslaw. Org under Client. Resources. DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. South Carolina, and Brooklyn. • Make sense of the unit's themes and demonstrate understanding of the people, art, and literature of the Harlem Renaissance. Patriot Act §213: Permits "Sneak and Peak" Warrants- Cops can engage in covert searches, provide delayed notice.
Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies
North Charleston South Carolina Aviso de cheque sin fondos - Civil y Penal - Palabras clave: cheque sin fondos, cheque sin fondos
Change state
To change the state, select it from the list below and press Change state.
Changing the state redirects you to another page.
South Carolina
Change state
-
No results found.
-
South Carolina
-
Alabama
-
Alaska
-
Arizona
-
Arkansas
-
California
-
Colorado
-
Connecticut
-
Delaware
-
District of Columbia
-
Florida
-
Georgia
-
Hawaii
-
Idaho
-
Illinois
-
Indiana
-
Iowa
-
Kansas
-
Kentucky
-
Louisiana
-
Maine
-
Maryland
-
Massachusetts
-
Michigan
-
Minnesota
-
Mississippi
-
Missouri
-
Montana
-
Nebraska
-
Nevada
-
New Hampshire
-
New Jersey
-
New Mexico
-
New York
-
North Carolina
-
North Dakota
-
Ohio
-
Oklahoma
-
Oregon
-
Pennsylvania
-
Rhode Island
-
South Dakota
-
Tennessee
-
Texas
-
Utah
-
Vermont
-
Virginia
-
Washington
-
West Virginia
-
Wisconsin
-
Wyoming
Law summary
Aviso de cheque sin fondos - Civil y Penal - Palabras clave: cheque sin fondos, cheque sin fondos
Note: This summary is not intended to be an all inclusive summary of the law of bad checks, but does contain basic and other provisions.
Civil & Criminal ProvisionsTITLE 34 BANKING, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND MONEY
CHAPTER 11 Bank Deposits
34-11-60 Drawing and uttering fraudulent check, draft or other written order
(a) It is unlawful for a person, with intent to defraud, in his own name or in any other capacity, to draw, make, utter, issue, or deliver to another a check, draft, or other written order on a bank or depository for the payment of money or its equivalent, whether given to pay rent, make a payment on a lease, obtain money, services, credit, or property of any kind or nature whatever, or anything of value which includes an obligation or debt of state taxes which is past due or presently due, when at the time of drawing, making, uttering, issuing, or delivering the check or draft or other written order the maker or drawer does not have an account in the bank or depository or does not have sufficient funds on deposit with the bank or depository to pay the same on presentation, or if the check, draft, or other written order has an incorrect or insufficient signature on it to be paid upon presentation.
(b) In any prosecution or action under the provisions of this section, a check, draft, or other written order for which the information required in item (1) of this subsection is available at the time of issuance shall constitute prima facie evidence of the identity of the party issuing the check, draft, or other written order and that such person was a party authorized to draw upon the named account. The failure of the person receiving the check to obtain the information specified in items (1) or (2) of this subsection shall not warrant dismissal of a prosecution or other action brought pursuant to this section, but the party bringing the action shall in such circumstances have the burden of proving that the defendant signed or endorsed the check and presented it in payment of some debt or other obligation.
(1) To establish this prima facie evidence, the full name, residence address, and home telephone number of the person presenting the check, draft, or other written order shall be obtained by the party receiving the instrument. This information may be provided by having the information recorded on the check or instrument itself, or the number of a check-cashing identification card issued by the receiving party may be recorded on the check. The check-cashing identification card shall be issued only after the full name, residence address, and home telephone number of the person presenting the check, draft, or other written order has been placed on file by the receiving party.
(2) In addition to the information required in item (1) of this subsection, the party receiving a check shall witness the signature or endorsement of the party presenting the check and as evidence of such, the receiving party shall initial the check. Validation by a bank teller machine shall constitute compliance with this item.
(c) It shall be the duty of the drawee of any check, draft, or other written order, before refusing to pay the same to the holder thereof upon presentation, to cause to be written, printed, or stamped in plain language thereon or attached thereto, the reason for drawee's dishonor or refusal to pay same. In all prosecutions under this section, the introduction in evidence of any unpaid and dishonored check, draft or other written order, having the drawee's refusal to pay stamped or written thereon, or attached thereto, with the reason therefor as aforesaid, shall be prima facie evidence of the making or uttering of such check, draft, or other written order, and the due presentation to the drawee for payment and the dishonor thereof, and that the same was properly dishonored for the reasons written, stamped or attached by the drawee on such dishonored check, draft, or other written order; and, as against the maker or drawer thereof, the withdrawing from deposit with the drawee named in the check, draft or other written order, the funds on deposit with such drawee necessary to insure payment of such check, draft or other written order upon presentation within ten days after negotiation; or the drawing, making, uttering or delivering of a check, draft or written order, payment of which is refused by the drawee, shall be prima facie evidence of knowledge of insufficient funds in or credit with such drawee; provided, however, if it is determined at the trial in a prosecution hereunder, that the payee of any such check, draft or written order at the time of accepting such check, draft or written order, had knowledge of or reason to believe that the drawer of such check, draft or other written order did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with such drawee, then the payee instituting such criminal prosecution shall be assessed all costs of court incurred in connection with such prosecution.
(d) The word "credit" as used in this section means securing further advances of money, goods, or services by means of a check, draft, or other written order, given in whole or in part payment of a then existing account. Payment for meals, lodging, or other goods or services at a hotel, motel, or other hostelry by means of a check, draft, or other written order before or upon departure or checkout from the hostelry is obtaining those goods or services by means of a check, draft, or other written order for the purposes of this section. This section applies to a check given in full or partial payment of any preexisting debt. This section does not apply to the giving of a check, draft, or other written order if the payee knows, has been expressly notified, or has reason to believe that the drawer did not have an account or have on deposit with the drawee sufficient funds to ensure payment of the check, nor to any check which has not been deposited to an account of the payee within a period of ten days from the date the check was presented to the payee. It is also unlawful for any person to induce, solicit, or to aid and abet any other person to draw, make, utter, issue, or deliver to any person including himself any check, draft, or other written order on any bank or depository for the payment of money or its equivalent, being informed, knowing, or having reasonable cause for believing at the time of the inducing, soliciting, or the aiding and abetting that the maker or the drawer of the check, draft, or other written order has not sufficient funds on deposit in, or an account with, the bank or depository with which to pay the same upon presentation.
(e) No warrant for a violation of this section may be obtained more than one hundred eighty days after the date the check was uttered.
HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 8-176; 1952 Code Section 8-176; 1942 Code Section 1167; 1932 Code Section 1167; Cr. C. '22 Section 60; Cr. C. '12 Section 208; 1909 (26) 21; 1914 (28) 489; 1923 (33) 120; 1964 (53) 2400; 1970 (56) 2053; 1979 Act No. 56 Section 1; 1988 Act No. 517, eff May 9, 1988; 1988 Act No. 669, Section 1, eff July 1, 1987; 1991 Act No. 112, Sections 1, 2, eff May 31, 1991; 1996 Act No. 235, Sections 1, 2, eff March 4, 1996; 1999 Act No. 87, Section 2, eff June 11, 1999.
34-11-70 Prima facie evidence of fraudulent intent in drawing check, draft or other written order, reasonable and probable cause for prosecution<br />
(a) When a check, a draft, or other written order is not paid by the drawee because the maker or drawer did not have an account with or sufficient funds on deposit with the bank or the person upon which it was drawn when presented or the draft, check, or other written order has an incorrect or insufficient signature on it, and the maker or drawer does not pay the amount due on it, together with a service charge of thirty dollars, within ten days after written notice has been sent by certified mail to the address printed on the check or given at the time it is tendered or provided on a check-cashing identification card stating that payment was refused upon the instrument, then it constitutes prima facie evidence of fraudulent intent against the maker. Service charges collected pursuant to this section must be paid to the payee of the instrument.<br />
<br />
(1) For purposes of subsection (a), notice must be given by mailing the notice with postage prepaid addressed to the person at the address as printed or written on the instrument. The giving of notice by mail is complete upon the expiration of ten days after the deposit of the notice in the mail. A certificate by the payee that the notice has been sent as required by this section is presumptive proof that the requirements as to notice have been met, regardless of the fact that the notice actually might not have been received by the addressee. The form of notice must be substantially as follows:<br />
<br />
“You are notified that a check or instrument, numbered _, issued by you on _ (date), drawn upon _ (name of bank), and payable to _, has been dishonored. Pursuant to South Carolina law, you have ten days from the date this notice was mailed to tender payment of the full amount of the check or instrument plus a service charge of thirty dollars, the total amount due being _ dollars and _ cents. Unless this amount is paid in full within the specified time above, the holder of the check or instrument may turn over the dishonored check or instrument and all other available information relating to this incident to the solicitor or other appropriate officer for criminal prosecution.”<br />
<br />
(2) When a person instituting prosecution gives notice in substantially similar form provided in item (1) to the person upon which the instrument was drawn and waits ten days from the date notice is mailed before instituting the criminal proceedings, there arises a presumption that the prosecution was instituted for reasonable and probable cause, and the person instituting prosecution is immune from civil liability for the giving of the notice.<br />
<br />
(3) A service charge of not more thirty dollars is payable by the drawer of a draft, a check, or other written order to the payee of the instrument when the draft, check, or other written order is presented for payment in whole or in part of a then existing debt including, but not limited to, consumer credit transactions, and is dishonored. This service charge is solely to compensate the payee of the instrument for incurred expenses in processing the dishonored instrument and is not related to a presumption of fraud so that it is not necessary to issue the notice to the person at the address as printed on the instrument set forth in items (1) and (2).<br />
<br />
(b) Any court, including magistrate’s, may dismiss a case under the provisions of this chapter for want of prosecution. When any prosecutions are initiated under this chapter, the party applying for the warrant is held liable for all reasonable administrative costs accruing not to exceed forty-one dollars if the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. Unless waived by the court, the party applying for the warrant shall notify, orally or otherwise, the court not less than twenty-four hours before the date and time set for trial that full restitution has been made in connection with the warrant, and the notification relieves that party of the responsibility of prosecution.<br />
<br />
(c) Any court, including magistrates, may dismiss any prosecution initiated pursuant to the provisions of this chapter on satisfactory proof of restitution and payment by the defendant of all administrative costs accruing not to exceed forty-one dollars submitted before the date set for trial after the issuance of a warrant.<br />
<br />
(d) For purposes of this chapter, subsequent persons receiving a check, draft, or other written order by endorsement from the original payee or a successor endorsee have the same rights that the original payee has against the maker of the instrument, if the maker of the instrument has the same defenses against subsequent persons as he may have had against the original payee. However, the remedies available under this chapter may be exercised only by one party in interest.<br />
<br />
HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 8-177; 1952 Code Section 8-177; 1942 Code Section 1167; 1932 Code Section 1167; Cr. C. ’22 Section 60; Cr. C. ’12 Section 208; 1909 (26) 21; 1914 (28) 489; 1923 (33) 120; 1970 (56) 2053; 1979 Act Nos. 56 Section 2, 93 Section 3; 1983 Act No. 73; 1984 Act No. 422; 1987 Act No. 75 Section 1, eff May 1, 1987; 1988 Act No. 669, Section 2, eff July 1, 1987; 1989 Act No. 14, Section 1, eff March 12, 1989; 1991 Act No. 36, Section 1, eff April 24, 1991; 1995 Act No. 138, Section 4, eff June 28, 1995; 1999 Act No. 87, Section 1, eff June 11, 1999; 2000 Act No. 226, Section 16, eff April 1, 2000; 2002 Act No. 291, Section 1, eff June 3, 2002.<br />
<br />
34-11-75 Civil remedy for drawing and uttering of fraudulent checks, drafts, or other written order<br />
<br />
As used in this section, “check” means a check, draft, or other written order drawn on a bank or depository.<br />
<br />
(1) In addition to criminal penalties, a person who knowingly or with fraudulent intent, as defined in and as may be established by prima facie evidence under the provisions of Section 34-11-70, draws, makes, utters, or issues and delivers to another a check drawn on a bank or depository that refuses to honor it because the maker or drawer does not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank or depository with which to pay the check upon presentation and who fails to pay the same amount in cash to the payee, within thirty days following written demand, is liable to the payee for the amount owing on the check and for damages of the lesser of five hundred dollars or three times the amount owing on the check. In an action under this section, the court or jury may waive all or part of the treble damages upon a finding that the defendant’s failure to satisfy the dishonored check was due to the defendant’s recent discharge from his employment, personal or family illness, or personal or family catastrophic loss.<br />
<br />
The written demand must:<br />
<br />
(a) describe the check and the circumstances of its dishonor;<br />
<br />
(b) contain a demand for payment and a notice of intent to file suit for treble damages under this section if payment is not received within thirty days; and<br />
<br />
(c) be mailed by certified mail to the defendant at his last known address.<br />
<br />
(2) In an action under item (1), the presiding judge may award the prevailing party, as part of the court costs payable, a reasonable attorney’s fee to the attorney representing the prevailing party in the action.<br />
<br />
(3) It is an affirmative defense, in addition to other defenses, to an action under this section if it is found that:<br />
<br />
(a) full satisfaction of the amount of the check was made before the beginning of the action;<br />
<br />
(b) the bank or depository erred in dishonoring the check; or<br />
<br />
(c) the acceptor of the check knew at the time of acceptance that there were insufficient funds on deposit in the bank or depository with which to cause the check to be honored.<br />
<br />
HISTORY: 1990 Act No. 332, Section 1, eff February 20, 1990.<br />
34-11-80 Stopping payment on check, draft or order with intent to defraud<br />
It shall be unlawful for any person with intent to defraud to stop payment on any check, draft or other written order on any bank or depository for the payment of money or its equivalent when such check, draft or other written order was given to obtain money, credit, goods or services; provided, that such money, credit, goods or services were as represented at the time of the issuance of any check, draft or written order. Any person so convicted shall be punished by a fine or imprisonment as provided for in Section 34-11-90.<br />
<br />
This section shall not apply to a postdated check nor to any check, draft or written order where the payee or holder thereof knows or has good and sufficient reason to believe that the drawer did not have sufficient funds on deposit to his credit with the drawee to insure payment thereof.<br />
<br />
HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 8-177.1; 1970 (56) 2056.<br />
<br />
34-11-90 Jurisdiction of offenses and penalties<br />
A person who violates the provisions of this chapter, upon conviction, must be punished as follows:<br />
<br />
If the amount of the instrument is one thousand dollars or less, it must be tried exclusively in a magistrates court. A municipal governing body, by ordinance, may adopt by reference the provisions of this chapter as an offense under its municipal ordinances and by so doing authorizes its municipal court to try violations of this chapter. If the amount of the instrument is over one thousand dollars, it must be tried in the court of general sessions or any other court having concurrent jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, a person who violates the provisions of this chapter, upon conviction for a third or subsequent conviction, may be tried in either a magistrates court or in the court of general sessions.<br />
<br />
(a) Convictions in a magistrates court are punishable as follows:<br />
<br />
(1) for a first conviction, if the amount of the instrument is five hundred dollars or less, by a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than two hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days;<br />
<br />
(2) for a first conviction, if the amount of the instrument is more than five hundred dollars but not greater than one thousand dollars, by a fine of not less than three hundred nor more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or both;<br />
<br />
(3) for a second or subsequent conviction, if the amount of the instrument is five hundred dollars or less, by a fine of two hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days;<br />
<br />
(4) for a second or subsequent conviction, if the amount of the instrument is more than five hundred dollars but not greater than one thousand dollars, by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or both.<br />
<br />
(b) Convictions in the court of general sessions or any other court having concurrent jurisdiction are punishable as follows: for a first conviction by a fine of not less than three hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not more than two years, or both; and for a second or subsequent conviction by a fine of not less than five hundred dollars nor more than two thousand dollars and imprisonment for not less than thirty days nor more than ten years.<br />
<br />
(c) After a first offense conviction for drawing and uttering a fraudulent check or other instrument in violation of Section 34-11-60 within its jurisdiction, the court shall, at the time of sentence, suspend the imposition or execution of a sentence upon a showing of satisfactory proof of restitution and payment by the defendant of all reasonable court costs accruing not to exceed forty-one dollars. For a second or subsequent conviction for a violation of Section 34-11-60 , the suspension of the imposition or execution of the sentence is discretionary with the court.<br />
<br />
(d) After a conviction or plea for drawing and uttering a fraudulent check or other instrument in violation of Section 34-11-60 and the defendant is charged or fined, he shall pay in addition to the fine all reasonable court costs accruing, not to exceed forty-one dollars, and the service charge provided in Section 34-11-70.<br />
<br />
(e) After a conviction under this section on a first offense, the defendant may, after one year from the date of the conviction, apply, or cause someone acting on his behalf to apply, to the court for an order expunging the records of the arrest and conviction. This provision does not apply to any crime classified as a felony. If the defendant has had no other conviction during the one-year period following the conviction under this section, the court shall issue an order expunging the records. No person has any rights under this section more than one time. After the expungement, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division is required to keep a nonpublic record of the offense and the date of its expungement to ensure that no person takes advantage of the rights permitted by this subsection more than once. This nonpublic record is not subject to release under Section 34-11-95, the Freedom of Information Act, or any other provision of law except to those authorized law or court officials who need this information in order to prevent the rights afforded by this subsection from being taken advantage of more than once.<br />
<br />
As used in this section the term “conviction” shall include the entering of a guilty plea, the entering of a plea of nolo contendere, or the forfeiting of bail. A conviction is classified as a felony if the instrument drawn or uttered in violation of this chapter exceeds the amount of five thousand dollars.<br />
<br />
Each instrument drawn or uttered in violation of this chapter constitutes a separate offense.<br />
<br />
HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 8-178; 1952 Code Section 8-178; 1942 Code Section 1167; 1932 Code Section 1167; Cr. C. ’22 Section 60; Cr. C. ’12 Section 208; 1909 (26) 21; 1914 (28) 489; 1923 (33) 120; 1954 (48) 1444; 1960 (51) 1929; 1970 (56) 2053; 1979 Act Nos. 56 Section 3, 93 Section 1; 1983 Act No. 133 Sections 1, 3; 1984 Act No. 423; 1989 Act No. 174, Sections 1, 2, eff ninety days after approval by the Governor (approved June 8, 1989); 1990 Act No. 609, Section 1, eff June 25, 1990; 2000 Act No. 226, Section 17, eff April 1, 2000; 2000 Act No. 257, Section 8, eff May 1, 2000.
Legal definition
Aviso de cheque sin fondos - Civil y Penal - Palabras clave: cheque sin fondos, cheque sin fondos
Note: This summary is not intended to be an all inclusive summary of the law of bad checks, but does contain basic and other provisions.
Civil & Criminal ProvisionsTITLE 34 BANKING, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND MONEY
CHAPTER 11 Bank Deposits
34-11-60 Drawing and uttering fraudulent check, draft or other written order
(a) It is unlawful for a person, with intent to defraud, in his own name or in any other capacity, to draw, make, utter, issue, or deliver to another a check, draft, or other written order on a bank or depository for the payment of money or its equivalent, whether given to pay rent, make a payment on a lease, obtain money, services, credit, or property of any kind or nature whatever, or anything of value which includes an obligation or debt of state taxes which is past due or presently due, when at the time of drawing, making, uttering, issuing, or delivering the check or draft or other written order the maker or drawer does not have an account in the bank or depository or does not have sufficient funds on deposit with the bank or depository to pay the same on presentation, or if the check, draft, or other written order has an incorrect or insufficient signature on it to be paid upon presentation.
(b) In any prosecution or action under the provisions of this section, a check, draft, or other written order for which the information required in item (1) of this subsection is available at the time of issuance shall constitute prima facie evidence of the identity of the party issuing the check, draft, or other written order and that such person was a party authorized to draw upon the named account. The failure of the person receiving the check to obtain the information specified in items (1) or (2) of this subsection shall not warrant dismissal of a prosecution or other action brought pursuant to this section, but the party bringing the action shall in such circumstances have the burden of proving that the defendant signed or endorsed the check and presented it in payment of some debt or other obligation.
(1) To establish this prima facie evidence, the full name, residence address, and home telephone number of the person presenting the check, draft, or other written order shall be obtained by the party receiving the instrument. This information may be provided by having the information recorded on the check or instrument itself, or the number of a check-cashing identification card issued by the receiving party may be recorded on the check. The check-cashing identification card shall be issued only after the full name, residence address, and home telephone number of the person presenting the check, draft, or other written order has been placed on file by the receiving party.
(2) In addition to the information required in item (1) of this subsection, the party receiving a check shall witness the signature or endorsement of the party presenting the check and as evidence of such, the receiving party shall initial the check. Validation by a bank teller machine shall constitute compliance with this item.
(c) It shall be the duty of the drawee of any check, draft, or other written order, before refusing to pay the same to the holder thereof upon presentation, to cause to be written, printed, or stamped in plain language thereon or attached thereto, the reason for drawee's dishonor or refusal to pay same. In all prosecutions under this section, the introduction in evidence of any unpaid and dishonored check, draft or other written order, having the drawee's refusal to pay stamped or written thereon, or attached thereto, with the reason therefor as aforesaid, shall be prima facie evidence of the making or uttering of such check, draft, or other written order, and the due presentation to the drawee for payment and the dishonor thereof, and that the same was properly dishonored for the reasons written, stamped or attached by the drawee on such dishonored check, draft, or other written order; and, as against the maker or drawer thereof, the withdrawing from deposit with the drawee named in the check, draft or other written order, the funds on deposit with such drawee necessary to insure payment of such check, draft or other written order upon presentation within ten days after negotiation; or the drawing, making, uttering or delivering of a check, draft or written order, payment of which is refused by the drawee, shall be prima facie evidence of knowledge of insufficient funds in or credit with such drawee; provided, however, if it is determined at the trial in a prosecution hereunder, that the payee of any such check, draft or written order at the time of accepting such check, draft or written order, had knowledge of or reason to believe that the drawer of such check, draft or other written order did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with such drawee, then the payee instituting such criminal prosecution shall be assessed all costs of court incurred in connection with such prosecution.
(d) The word "credit" as used in this section means securing further advances of money, goods, or services by means of a check, draft, or other written order, given in whole or in part payment of a then existing account. Payment for meals, lodging, or other goods or services at a hotel, motel, or other hostelry by means of a check, draft, or other written order before or upon departure or checkout from the hostelry is obtaining those goods or services by means of a check, draft, or other written order for the purposes of this section. This section applies to a check given in full or partial payment of any preexisting debt. This section does not apply to the giving of a check, draft, or other written order if the payee knows, has been expressly notified, or has reason to believe that the drawer did not have an account or have on deposit with the drawee sufficient funds to ensure payment of the check, nor to any check which has not been deposited to an account of the payee within a period of ten days from the date the check was presented to the payee. It is also unlawful for any person to induce, solicit, or to aid and abet any other person to draw, make, utter, issue, or deliver to any person including himself any check, draft, or other written order on any bank or depository for the payment of money or its equivalent, being informed, knowing, or having reasonable cause for believing at the time of the inducing, soliciting, or the aiding and abetting that the maker or the drawer of the check, draft, or other written order has not sufficient funds on deposit in, or an account with, the bank or depository with which to pay the same upon presentation.
(e) No warrant for a violation of this section may be obtained more than one hundred eighty days after the date the check was uttered.
HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 8-176; 1952 Code Section 8-176; 1942 Code Section 1167; 1932 Code Section 1167; Cr. C. '22 Section 60; Cr. C. '12 Section 208; 1909 (26) 21; 1914 (28) 489; 1923 (33) 120; 1964 (53) 2400; 1970 (56) 2053; 1979 Act No. 56 Section 1; 1988 Act No. 517, eff May 9, 1988; 1988 Act No. 669, Section 1, eff July 1, 1987; 1991 Act No. 112, Sections 1, 2, eff May 31, 1991; 1996 Act No. 235, Sections 1, 2, eff March 4, 1996; 1999 Act No. 87, Section 2, eff June 11, 1999.
34-11-70 Prima facie evidence of fraudulent intent in drawing check, draft or other written order, reasonable and probable cause for prosecution<br />
(a) When a check, a draft, or other written order is not paid by the drawee because the maker or drawer did not have an account with or sufficient funds on deposit with the bank or the person upon which it was drawn when presented or the draft, check, or other written order has an incorrect or insufficient signature on it, and the maker or drawer does not pay the amount due on it, together with a service charge of thirty dollars, within ten days after written notice has been sent by certified mail to the address printed on the check or given at the time it is tendered or provided on a check-cashing identification card stating that payment was refused upon the instrument, then it constitutes prima facie evidence of fraudulent intent against the maker. Service charges collected pursuant to this section must be paid to the payee of the instrument.<br />
<br />
(1) For purposes of subsection (a), notice must be given by mailing the notice with postage prepaid addressed to the person at the address as printed or written on the instrument. The giving of notice by mail is complete upon the expiration of ten days after the deposit of the notice in the mail. A certificate by the payee that the notice has been sent as required by this section is presumptive proof that the requirements as to notice have been met, regardless of the fact that the notice actually might not have been received by the addressee. The form of notice must be substantially as follows:<br />
<br />
“You are notified that a check or instrument, numbered _, issued by you on _ (date), drawn upon _ (name of bank), and payable to _, has been dishonored. Pursuant to South Carolina law, you have ten days from the date this notice was mailed to tender payment of the full amount of the check or instrument plus a service charge of thirty dollars, the total amount due being _ dollars and _ cents. Unless this amount is paid in full within the specified time above, the holder of the check or instrument may turn over the dishonored check or instrument and all other available information relating to this incident to the solicitor or other appropriate officer for criminal prosecution.”<br />
<br />
(2) When a person instituting prosecution gives notice in substantially similar form provided in item (1) to the person upon which the instrument was drawn and waits ten days from the date notice is mailed before instituting the criminal proceedings, there arises a presumption that the prosecution was instituted for reasonable and probable cause, and the person instituting prosecution is immune from civil liability for the giving of the notice.<br />
<br />
(3) A service charge of not more thirty dollars is payable by the drawer of a draft, a check, or other written order to the payee of the instrument when the draft, check, or other written order is presented for payment in whole or in part of a then existing debt including, but not limited to, consumer credit transactions, and is dishonored. This service charge is solely to compensate the payee of the instrument for incurred expenses in processing the dishonored instrument and is not related to a presumption of fraud so that it is not necessary to issue the notice to the person at the address as printed on the instrument set forth in items (1) and (2).<br />
<br />
(b) Any court, including magistrate’s, may dismiss a case under the provisions of this chapter for want of prosecution. When any prosecutions are initiated under this chapter, the party applying for the warrant is held liable for all reasonable administrative costs accruing not to exceed forty-one dollars if the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. Unless waived by the court, the party applying for the warrant shall notify, orally or otherwise, the court not less than twenty-four hours before the date and time set for trial that full restitution has been made in connection with the warrant, and the notification relieves that party of the responsibility of prosecution.<br />
<br />
(c) Any court, including magistrates, may dismiss any prosecution initiated pursuant to the provisions of this chapter on satisfactory proof of restitution and payment by the defendant of all administrative costs accruing not to exceed forty-one dollars submitted before the date set for trial after the issuance of a warrant.<br />
<br />
(d) For purposes of this chapter, subsequent persons receiving a check, draft, or other written order by endorsement from the original payee or a successor endorsee have the same rights that the original payee has against the maker of the instrument, if the maker of the instrument has the same defenses against subsequent persons as he may have had against the original payee. However, the remedies available under this chapter may be exercised only by one party in interest.<br />
<br />
HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 8-177; 1952 Code Section 8-177; 1942 Code Section 1167; 1932 Code Section 1167; Cr. C. ’22 Section 60; Cr. C. ’12 Section 208; 1909 (26) 21; 1914 (28) 489; 1923 (33) 120; 1970 (56) 2053; 1979 Act Nos. 56 Section 2, 93 Section 3; 1983 Act No. 73; 1984 Act No. 422; 1987 Act No. 75 Section 1, eff May 1, 1987; 1988 Act No. 669, Section 2, eff July 1, 1987; 1989 Act No. 14, Section 1, eff March 12, 1989; 1991 Act No. 36, Section 1, eff April 24, 1991; 1995 Act No. 138, Section 4, eff June 28, 1995; 1999 Act No. 87, Section 1, eff June 11, 1999; 2000 Act No. 226, Section 16, eff April 1, 2000; 2002 Act No. 291, Section 1, eff June 3, 2002.<br />
<br />
34-11-75 Civil remedy for drawing and uttering of fraudulent checks, drafts, or other written order<br />
<br />
As used in this section, “check” means a check, draft, or other written order drawn on a bank or depository.<br />
<br />
(1) In addition to criminal penalties, a person who knowingly or with fraudulent intent, as defined in and as may be established by prima facie evidence under the provisions of Section 34-11-70, draws, makes, utters, or issues and delivers to another a check drawn on a bank or depository that refuses to honor it because the maker or drawer does not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with the bank or depository with which to pay the check upon presentation and who fails to pay the same amount in cash to the payee, within thirty days following written demand, is liable to the payee for the amount owing on the check and for damages of the lesser of five hundred dollars or three times the amount owing on the check. In an action under this section, the court or jury may waive all or part of the treble damages upon a finding that the defendant’s failure to satisfy the dishonored check was due to the defendant’s recent discharge from his employment, personal or family illness, or personal or family catastrophic loss.<br />
<br />
The written demand must:<br />
<br />
(a) describe the check and the circumstances of its dishonor;<br />
<br />
(b) contain a demand for payment and a notice of intent to file suit for treble damages under this section if payment is not received within thirty days; and<br />
<br />
(c) be mailed by certified mail to the defendant at his last known address.<br />
<br />
(2) In an action under item (1), the presiding judge may award the prevailing party, as part of the court costs payable, a reasonable attorney’s fee to the attorney representing the prevailing party in the action.<br />
<br />
(3) It is an affirmative defense, in addition to other defenses, to an action under this section if it is found that:<br />
<br />
(a) full satisfaction of the amount of the check was made before the beginning of the action;<br />
<br />
(b) the bank or depository erred in dishonoring the check; or<br />
<br />
(c) the acceptor of the check knew at the time of acceptance that there were insufficient funds on deposit in the bank or depository with which to cause the check to be honored.<br />
<br />
HISTORY: 1990 Act No. 332, Section 1, eff February 20, 1990.<br />
34-11-80 Stopping payment on check, draft or order with intent to defraud<br />
It shall be unlawful for any person with intent to defraud to stop payment on any check, draft or other written order on any bank or depository for the payment of money or its equivalent when such check, draft or other written order was given to obtain money, credit, goods or services; provided, that such money, credit, goods or services were as represented at the time of the issuance of any check, draft or written order. Any person so convicted shall be punished by a fine or imprisonment as provided for in Section 34-11-90.<br />
<br />
This section shall not apply to a postdated check nor to any check, draft or written order where the payee or holder thereof knows or has good and sufficient reason to believe that the drawer did not have sufficient funds on deposit to his credit with the drawee to insure payment thereof.<br />
<br />
HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 8-177.1; 1970 (56) 2056.<br />
<br />
34-11-90 Jurisdiction of offenses and penalties<br />
A person who violates the provisions of this chapter, upon conviction, must be punished as follows:<br />
<br />
If the amount of the instrument is one thousand dollars or less, it must be tried exclusively in a magistrates court. A municipal governing body, by ordinance, may adopt by reference the provisions of this chapter as an offense under its municipal ordinances and by so doing authorizes its municipal court to try violations of this chapter. If the amount of the instrument is over one thousand dollars, it must be tried in the court of general sessions or any other court having concurrent jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, a person who violates the provisions of this chapter, upon conviction for a third or subsequent conviction, may be tried in either a magistrates court or in the court of general sessions.<br />
<br />
(a) Convictions in a magistrates court are punishable as follows:<br />
<br />
(1) for a first conviction, if the amount of the instrument is five hundred dollars or less, by a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than two hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days;<br />
<br />
(2) for a first conviction, if the amount of the instrument is more than five hundred dollars but not greater than one thousand dollars, by a fine of not less than three hundred nor more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or both;<br />
<br />
(3) for a second or subsequent conviction, if the amount of the instrument is five hundred dollars or less, by a fine of two hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days;<br />
<br />
(4) for a second or subsequent conviction, if the amount of the instrument is more than five hundred dollars but not greater than one thousand dollars, by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or both.<br />
<br />
(b) Convictions in the court of general sessions or any other court having concurrent jurisdiction are punishable as follows: for a first conviction by a fine of not less than three hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not more than two years, or both; and for a second or subsequent conviction by a fine of not less than five hundred dollars nor more than two thousand dollars and imprisonment for not less than thirty days nor more than ten years.<br />
<br />
(c) After a first offense conviction for drawing and uttering a fraudulent check or other instrument in violation of Section 34-11-60 within its jurisdiction, the court shall, at the time of sentence, suspend the imposition or execution of a sentence upon a showing of satisfactory proof of restitution and payment by the defendant of all reasonable court costs accruing not to exceed forty-one dollars. For a second or subsequent conviction for a violation of Section 34-11-60 , the suspension of the imposition or execution of the sentence is discretionary with the court.<br />
<br />
(d) After a conviction or plea for drawing and uttering a fraudulent check or other instrument in violation of Section 34-11-60 and the defendant is charged or fined, he shall pay in addition to the fine all reasonable court costs accruing, not to exceed forty-one dollars, and the service charge provided in Section 34-11-70.<br />
<br />
(e) After a conviction under this section on a first offense, the defendant may, after one year from the date of the conviction, apply, or cause someone acting on his behalf to apply, to the court for an order expunging the records of the arrest and conviction. This provision does not apply to any crime classified as a felony. If the defendant has had no other conviction during the one-year period following the conviction under this section, the court shall issue an order expunging the records. No person has any rights under this section more than one time. After the expungement, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division is required to keep a nonpublic record of the offense and the date of its expungement to ensure that no person takes advantage of the rights permitted by this subsection more than once. This nonpublic record is not subject to release under Section 34-11-95, the Freedom of Information Act, or any other provision of law except to those authorized law or court officials who need this information in order to prevent the rights afforded by this subsection from being taken advantage of more than once.<br />
<br />
As used in this section the term “conviction” shall include the entering of a guilty plea, the entering of a plea of nolo contendere, or the forfeiting of bail. A conviction is classified as a felony if the instrument drawn or uttered in violation of this chapter exceeds the amount of five thousand dollars.<br />
<br />
Each instrument drawn or uttered in violation of this chapter constitutes a separate offense.<br />
<br />
HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 8-178; 1952 Code Section 8-178; 1942 Code Section 1167; 1932 Code Section 1167; Cr. C. ’22 Section 60; Cr. C. ’12 Section 208; 1909 (26) 21; 1914 (28) 489; 1923 (33) 120; 1954 (48) 1444; 1960 (51) 1929; 1970 (56) 2053; 1979 Act Nos. 56 Section 3, 93 Section 1; 1983 Act No. 133 Sections 1, 3; 1984 Act No. 423; 1989 Act No. 174, Sections 1, 2, eff ninety days after approval by the Governor (approved June 8, 1989); 1990 Act No. 609, Section 1, eff June 25, 1990; 2000 Act No. 226, Section 17, eff April 1, 2000; 2000 Act No. 257, Section 8, eff May 1, 2000.
Sorry, this device is not supported
Please open this page on your desktop computer.
