Memphis Tennessee Affirmative Defenses — Part 2 refers to a legal concept in the state of Tennessee that allows defendants to present additional defenses beyond merely denying the allegations made against them. These defenses are known as affirmative defenses, and they aim to establish that even if the plaintiff's claim is true, the defendant should still not be held liable or accountable. There are several types of affirmative defenses that can be used in Memphis, Tennessee. One common type is the defense of contributory negligence or comparative fault. This defense argues that the plaintiff's own actions or negligence played a role in causing the harm they are alleging, and therefore, they should be held partially responsible for their injuries or damages. Another type of affirmative defense is assumption of risk. This defense asserts that the plaintiff voluntarily took on a known risk associated with the alleged wrongdoing, and therefore, they should bear the consequences of any resulting harm. Additionally, the defense of statute of limitations may be used as an affirmative defense. This defense argues that the plaintiff filed their lawsuit after the legally specified time limit, and therefore, their claim is barred by law. Another affirmative defense commonly employed is the defense of caches. This defense asserts that the plaintiff unreasonably delayed in pursuing their claim, and as a result, the defendant has been prejudiced or harmed. Therefore, the defendant argues that the claim should be dismissed. Lastly, the defense of estoppel can also be utilized as an affirmative defense. This defense asserts that the plaintiff is prevented from making a particular claim or assertion due to their prior actions or representations. Overall, Memphis Tennessee Affirmative Defenses — Part 2 provides defendants with an opportunity to present additional arguments to counter the plaintiff's allegations. These defenses include contributory negligence, assumption of risk, statute of limitations, caches, and estoppel, among others. By utilizing these defenses effectively, defendants aim to avoid or minimize their liability or accountability in legal proceedings.