The Houston Texas Agreed Order of Judgment is a legal agreement that outlines the resolution of a dispute between parties involved in a lawsuit. This judgment is entered into by mutual consent, as opposed to a judgment made by a judge after a trial. It serves as a final resolution to the case and prevents further litigation. The Agreed Order of Judgment specifies the terms and conditions upon which the parties have agreed. It may include provisions related to monetary compensation, property division, child custody and support, spousal support, or any other relevant issue specific to the particular case. The agreement reflects the compromises made by both parties and is legally binding once approved by the court. Some key terms that may be associated with the Houston Texas Agreed Order of Judgment include: 1. Dispute resolution: This refers to the process involved in reaching an agreement between the parties involved in the lawsuit. It may involve negotiations, mediation, or other alternative dispute resolution methods to achieve a mutually satisfactory outcome. 2. Mutual consent: All parties must voluntarily agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the Agreed Order of Judgment. This signifies their acknowledgment and acceptance of the resolution proposed. 3. Finality: Once the court approves and signs the Agreed Order of Judgment, it becomes legally binding, putting an end to the litigation. The parties are generally prohibited from reopening the case unless there are exceptional circumstances or a provision within the agreement allows for modifications under certain conditions. 4. Types of Agreed Orders: While the specific types of Agreed Orders may vary depending on the nature of the case, common ones include Agreed Order of Adoption, Agreed Order of Divorce, Agreed Order of Child Custody, Agreed Order of Settlement, or Agreed Order of Dismissal. These different types reflect the specific issues or aspects that the parties have resolved and agreed upon. Overall, the Houston Texas Agreed Order of Judgment is an effective and efficient way to resolve legal disputes, as it saves time, money, and judicial resources involved in a traditional trial. It allows the involved parties to have control over the outcome, promotes timely resolution, and provides a final resolution to their legal dispute.