Restrictions to prevent competition by a former employee are held valid when they are reasonable and necessary to protect the interests of the employer. For example, a provision in an employment contract which prohibited an employee for two years from calling on any customer of the employer called on by the employee during the last six months of employment would generally be valid. Courts will closely examine covenants not to compete signed by individuals in order to make sure that they are not unreasonable as to time or geographical area. For example, if a company only operated within one city, and the covenant not to compete provided that an employee of the company could not solicit business within 100 miles of the city if he/she ever left the employ of the company, such an agreement would be unreasonable as to its geographical area. The company had no need to be protected regarding such a large geographical area.
Para su conveniencia, debajo del texto en español le brindamos la versión completa de este formulario en inglés. For your convenience, the complete English version of this form is attached below the Spanish version.Minneapolis Minnesota Acuerdo de Empleo con el Director de Guardería o Centro de Cuidado Infantil incluyendo Disposición de No Competencia - Employment Agreement with Director of Day Care or Child Care Center including Non-Competition Provision
State:
Multi-State
City:
Minneapolis
Control #:
US-01436BG
Format:
Word
Instant download
Description
Free preview
