San Diego California Jury Instruction — 1.1: Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline provided to juries in San Diego courts to help them understand and apply the concept of comparative negligence in personal injury cases. This instruction is crucial in cases where both the plaintiff and defendant may have contributed to the accident or injury in question. Keywords: San Diego, California, jury instruction, 1.1, comparative negligence defense, personal injury cases. Comparative negligence is a legal principle that allows the court to allocate fault between the parties involved in an accident, enabling the injured party to seek compensation even if they were partially at fault. In San Diego, this defense can be used by defendants to mitigate or reduce the amount of damages they may be required to pay. There are different types of San Diego California Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense that may be applicable depending on the circumstances of the case. Some of these variations could include: 1. Proportional Comparative Negligence: Under this type, the jury is instructed to assign a percentage of fault to each party involved based on their contribution to the accident. The injured party's compensation is then reduced by their percentage of fault. For example, if the injured person is determined to be 30% responsible for the accident, they would only be entitled to 70% of the total damages. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence: San Diego also follows the "51% Rule" in personal injury cases. This means that the injured party can only seek compensation if they are found to be 50% or less responsible for the accident. If their share of fault is determined to be 51% or more, they would be barred from recovering any damages. 3. Pure Comparative Negligence: In some states, including California, a pure comparative negligence system is followed. This means that even if the injured party is 99% at fault, they can still be eligible to receive compensation. However, the amount awarded would be reduced by their percentage of fault. 4. Joint and Several liabilities: While not directly related to comparative negligence, this concept may be relevant in cases involving multiple defendants. Joint and several liabilities refers to the legal principle that allows a plaintiff to collect the full amount of damages from any one defendant, regardless of their share of fault. However, the defendant who paid more than their allocated share of fault can seek contribution from other responsible parties. In summary, San Diego California Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline that provides juries in San Diego courts with instructions on how to determine the portion of fault and allocate damages in personal injury cases where both parties may have contributed to the accident. Understanding the different types of comparative negligence and their application is crucial for ensuring fair and just compensation for all parties involved.