The Suffolk New York Jury Instruction 1.3.1 Civil Rights Act 42 USC Sect.1981 focuses specifically on race discrimination in employment discharge and failure to promote. This general instruction serves as the guideline for jurors in understanding and applying the relevant laws and principles in cases related to discrimination based on race. The purpose of this instruction is to provide clarity on the requirements and standards necessary to prove a violation of the Civil Rights Act 42 USC Sect.1981 in a race discrimination case in the context of employment discharge and failure to promote. Keywords: Suffolk New York, jury instruction, Civil Rights Act, 42 USC Sect.1981, race discrimination, employment discharge, failure to promote Different types of Suffolk New York Jury Instruction — 1.3.1 Civil Rights Act 42 USC Sect.1981 Race Discrimination In Employment Discharge — Failure To Promote General Instruction may include: 1. Elements of a race discrimination claim: This instruction would outline the essential elements that need to be proven by the plaintiff in order to establish a valid claim of race discrimination based on employment discharge or failure to promote. It could include requirements such as proving the existence of an employment relationship, demonstrating adverse employment actions, and establishing that race was a motivating factor in the decision. 2. Proof burden in race discrimination cases: This instruction would address the burden of proof placed on the plaintiff and employer in a race discrimination case. It could clarify the different standards of evidence required and the respective responsibilities of each party in presenting their case. 3. Defenses against race discrimination claims: This instruction would outline potential defenses that an employer may raise against a race discrimination claim related to employment discharge or failure to promote. It could address factors such as legitimate business justifications, qualifications, or performance-related issues that may be considered lawful reasons for the employer's actions. 4. Causation and discriminatory intent: This instruction would focus on the requirement of proving discriminatory intent and causation in race discrimination cases. It could explain that the plaintiff must establish a direct connection between their race and the adverse employment action, demonstrating that race played a substantial motivating role in the decision. These different instructions aim to provide jurors with a comprehensive understanding of the legal principles and standards that they should apply when deliberating on a race discrimination case in the context of employment discharge or failure to promote under the Civil Rights Act 42 USC Sect.1981.