San Jose California Jury Instruction - 1.5.2 Reasonable Accommodation Claim

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Adverse Employment Action
• State: Multi-State
• City: San Jose
• Control #: US-11CF-1-5-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. San Jose California Jury Instruction — 1.5.2 Reasonable Accommodation Claim: In San Jose, California, jury instruction 1.5.2 deals with the legal concept of reasonable accommodation claims. This instruction provides guidance to the jury when deciding cases where an individual is alleging discrimination based on disability and seeking reasonable accommodations under the law. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FHA), employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations to employees or job applicants with disabilities, unless doing so would create an undue hardship for the employer. Reasonable accommodation claims arise when an individual with a disability believes that their employer failed to provide them with necessary accommodations, thereby resulting in discrimination. The purpose of this jury instruction is to guide the jury in assessing the validity and merits of such claims during trial. The instruction emphasizes that for a reasonable accommodation claim to be successful, the plaintiff must establish the following elements: 1. The plaintiff is an individual with a disability within the meaning of the law. 2. The defendant (employer) is subject to the ADA or FHA. 3. The plaintiff requested an accommodation or the need for accommodation was known by the defendant. 4. The requested accommodation was necessary to allow the plaintiff to perform the essential functions of the job, enjoy equal benefits, or participate in the employment application process. 5. The defendant failed to provide the requested accommodation. 6. The defendant's failure to provide the accommodation caused harm to the plaintiff. It is important to note that there may be different types of reasonable accommodation claims falling under San Jose California's jury instruction 1.5.2, such as claims related to physical accommodations, technological accommodations, flexibility in work schedules, modifications to policies or procedures, and more. Each claim may have its own unique set of facts and circumstances, which the jury needs to consider during the trial. Overall, this jury instruction serves as a crucial tool for ensuring the fair and just evaluation of reasonable accommodation claims in San Jose, California, where individuals with disabilities seek justice and protection under the law.

San Jose California Jury Instruction — 1.5.2 Reasonable Accommodation Claim: In San Jose, California, jury instruction 1.5.2 deals with the legal concept of reasonable accommodation claims. This instruction provides guidance to the jury when deciding cases where an individual is alleging discrimination based on disability and seeking reasonable accommodations under the law. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FHA), employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations to employees or job applicants with disabilities, unless doing so would create an undue hardship for the employer. Reasonable accommodation claims arise when an individual with a disability believes that their employer failed to provide them with necessary accommodations, thereby resulting in discrimination. The purpose of this jury instruction is to guide the jury in assessing the validity and merits of such claims during trial. The instruction emphasizes that for a reasonable accommodation claim to be successful, the plaintiff must establish the following elements: 1. The plaintiff is an individual with a disability within the meaning of the law. 2. The defendant (employer) is subject to the ADA or FHA. 3. The plaintiff requested an accommodation or the need for accommodation was known by the defendant. 4. The requested accommodation was necessary to allow the plaintiff to perform the essential functions of the job, enjoy equal benefits, or participate in the employment application process. 5. The defendant failed to provide the requested accommodation. 6. The defendant's failure to provide the accommodation caused harm to the plaintiff. It is important to note that there may be different types of reasonable accommodation claims falling under San Jose California's jury instruction 1.5.2, such as claims related to physical accommodations, technological accommodations, flexibility in work schedules, modifications to policies or procedures, and more. Each claim may have its own unique set of facts and circumstances, which the jury needs to consider during the trial. Overall, this jury instruction serves as a crucial tool for ensuring the fair and just evaluation of reasonable accommodation claims in San Jose, California, where individuals with disabilities seek justice and protection under the law.