Get Tarasoff V Regents Of The University Of California 17 Cal 3d 425 551 P2d 334 131 Cal Rptr 14 Cal

TARASOFF VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL - THE MENTAL HEALTH WORKER AS EXPERT IN THE PREDICTION OF VIOLENT BEHAVIOR. A CALIFORNIA STATE SUPREME COURT RULING IMPLYING THAT PSYCHOTHERAPISTS HAVE THE DUTY TO WARN THIRD PARTIES OF THREATS MADE BY THEIR PATIENTS IS EXAMINED AND CRITICIZED.

Tarasoff v. Regents simply codifies the right of people to sue if a mental health professional does not warn them of an imminent threat against them. The ruling applies only in California, but it has been used across the nation to educate therapists about the importance of protecting third parties.

"When a therapist determines, or pursuant to the standards of his profession should determine, that his patient presents a serious danger of violence to another, he incurs an obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim against such danger.

Effect of Tarasoff Tarasoff v. Regents simply codifies the right of people to sue if a mental health professional does not warn them of an imminent threat against them. The ruling applies only in California, but it has been used across the nation to educate therapists about the importance of protecting third parties.

TARASOFF VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL - THE MENTAL HEALTH WORKER AS EXPERT IN THE PREDICTION OF VIOLENT BEHAVIOR. A CALIFORNIA STATE SUPREME COURT RULING IMPLYING THAT PSYCHOTHERAPISTS HAVE THE DUTY TO WARN THIRD PARTIES OF THREATS MADE BY THEIR PATIENTS IS EXAMINED AND CRITICIZED.

The ruling in the Tarasoff case, sometimes called duty to warn, implies that counselors need to take reasonable action to help protect potential victims from serious and foreseeable harm.

Rule of Law When a therapist learns from his patient about intent to do harm to a third party, the therapist has a duty to take reasonable precautions given the circumstances to warn the potential victim of danger.

California's Tarasoff duty, or Duty to Protect, applies when a patient makes a threat to a psychotherapist of serious violence against a reasonably identifiable victim or victims.