Get Findings Of Fact, Conclusions - Law Drake

What's the Difference Between a Question of Law and a Question of Fact? The short and simple answer is that questions of law are for the judge to decide whereas questions of fact are for the jury to decide.

When there is disagreement about the facts of a case, the judge or jury determines what the facts are by making findings of fact. The findings of fact — for example, that the light was red, not green as the plaintiff alleges — must be supported by evidence in the record.

“What did you see/hear/experience?” “When did the situation occur?” “Where did the situation occur?” “Who was involved?” “How were you impacted by what occurred?” or “How do you see the situation?” “What concerns do you have?” “Was anyone else present?” “What was their involvement?” “Why do you think it happen?” “Has ...

A fact is a provable statement. It can be shown to be true or false without any doubt, usually through some indisputable evidence, like a measurement or an observation. For instance, it is a proven fact that the Civil War occurred from 1861-1865. You can look it up in any history book and find the same dates.

A finding of fact, also known as a conclusion of fact, refers to decisions made by the trier of fact on questions of fact in a case. Questions of fact arise when parties disagree on facts, and after presenting evidence, the trier of fact must decide what the facts actually are.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law form the basis for the appeal. Findings of fact and conclusions of law serve many purposes. They allow litigants to know the reasons for the trial court's ruling. This in turn narrows the issues for appeal.

Fact-finding is fundamental when the events that led up to a crime or conflict are unclear or disputed by the parties involved. In these cases, developing a shared understanding of what happened facilitates empathetic communication and is an important prerequisite to building consensus towards an agreement.

Conclusion of fact (also referred to as finding of fact) refers to decisions made by the trier of fact on questions of fact in a case. Questions of fact arise when parties disagree on facts, and after presenting evidence, the trier of fact must decide what the facts actually are.