In intentional torts, ∆ are liable for all consequences of their wrongful conduct. Contrast to federal law.An agent may be solely liable to a third party for tortious conduct in certain circumstances. The general rule is that a principal is liable for torts only if the servant committed them "in the scope of employment. II. Negligence torts.III. Tort law provides a framework for determining school and agency liability in negligence cases. By contrast, in tort, a principal is only liable in limited (and at first blush arbitrary) categories, for the actions of their agent. Principal and Agent or Employer and Employee — Both Parties Sued — Issue as to. By contrast, in tort, a principal is only liable in limited (and at first blush arbitrary) categories, for the actions of their agent. ✓ Unintentional torts: negligence and strict liability.