Practice Commentaries—cite as: Author's last name, McKinney Practice Commentary, statute name and section (year of the commentary, if there is one). Example: Scheinkman, McKinney Practice Commentary, DRL § 111 (1991).
Include background information as a parenthetical following the cite to the Code: Example: N.Y.C. Admin. Code §§ __ - __ (enacted pursuant to N.Y.
There are generally four elements in a citation to a statute in the United States Code: The title number. The abbreviation of the code used (here, U.S.C.) The section symbol (§) followed by a space and the section number containing the statute. The year of the code. (optional if citing to the current code - Bluebook R.
For state laws include: Law's common name (if it has one). Title Number (refers to volumes of the state's law code) Source abbreviated, the New York State code is abbreviated based upon where it is accessed. Section number or numbers with "§" in front.
The citation (for legal documents) looks like this: Donnino, Practice Commentary, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law § 125.00. <Author's last name>, Practice Commentary, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book <book number from spine of book>, <subject> <statute section>.
Do not use the abbreviation l. or ll., but instead in your first citation, use the word line, or lines as shown in the example above. After the first citation it can be assumed that the numbers refer to lines, so you can include the numbers alone.
Contrary to Table 1.3 in The Bluebook and Appendix 1 in the ALWD Manual, New York practitioners abbreviate this publication as “NYCRR.” The abbreviation is preceded by the appropriate title number and followed by the appropriate section number. No section symbol is used, and the date is omitted. 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(b)(1).
Decisions of the New York Court of Appeals are published officially in the New York Reports (N.Y., N.Y. 2d, N.Y. 3d). With the exception of citing to the official reporter, New York practitioners otherwise follow The Bluebook.
Four of them are personal: assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment. The other three are trespass to chattels, trespass to property, and conversion.
In addition, some judges have, on a retroactive basis, created brand new tort claims that have no basis in precedent or state public policy. The courts have, in some instances, acted as legislators.