Sherwood argues that the contract was made with each party having different understandings and expectations, which does not inherently invalidate the agreement. The case of Sherwood V Walker which comes from late nineteenth-century Michigan asks the question what happens when both parties to a contract.This is a family dispute involving the ownership of a tractor, a cow, and a calf. The parties would not have made the contract of sale except upon the understanding and belief that she was incapable of breeding, and of no use as a cow. This completely changed the kind of a cow that was to be sold and the whole consideration of the contract. 2. Whether the Trial Court properly found that the Mashpee. In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of Maine. The Holland Pippin was voted out of this list, and the American Summer Pearmain and Black. Detroit added to it No other changes were made. This product is no longer affiliated or otherwise associated with any LexisNexis® company.