This form is a Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody based on Lack of Voluntariness of confession and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Adapt to your specific circumstances. Don't reinvent the wheel, save time and money.
This form is a Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody based on Lack of Voluntariness of confession and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Adapt to your specific circumstances. Don't reinvent the wheel, save time and money.
(A) It is the unequivocal intention of the People of the State of California that all persons who suffer losses as a result of criminal activity shall have the right to seek and secure restitution from the persons convicted of the crimes causing the losses they suffer.
As of 2024, Michigan law includes state statutory protection for abortion as a fundamental right. H.B. 4949, 102nd Leg., Reg.
This action protected the right to prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion, miscarriage management, and infertility care in the Michigan constitution. Since then, attacks on reproductive freedom have continued.
§ 28 Right to reproductive freedom. An individual's right to reproductive freedom shall not be denied, burdened, nor infringed upon unless justified by a compelling state interest achieved by the least restrictive means.
An individual's right to reproductive freedom shall not be denied, burdened, nor infringed upon unless justified by a compelling state interest achieved by the least restrictive means.
In order to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must show that trial counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that the defendant suffered prejudice.
Ineffective assistance of counsel refers to a situation in which a criminal defendant's legal representation fails to meet the minimum standards of competence and diligence expected from attorneys.
Final answer: Failing to meet a court-imposed deadline is most likely not to qualify as ineffective assistance of counsel because it is a procedural issue that may not directly impact the defense's effectiveness as per Strickland v. Washington and Padilla v. Kentucky.
The Difficulties of Meeting the Strickland Test Having to meet both prongs of the test, counsel's substandard performance and prejudice, are daunting tasks. The courts endorse a presumption that counsel's representation was effective, and a defendant must produce evidence to overcome that presumption.