Amendment Of Us V Lopez In Chicago
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
United States v. Lopez (93-1260), 514 U.S. 549 (1995).
Lopez argues that section 922(q) exceeds Congress' delegated powers and violates the Tenth Amendment. The government counters that section 922(q) is a permissible exercise of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause.
In United States v. Lopez (1995), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had exceeded its constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause when it passed a law prohibiting gun possession in local school zones.
Lopez challenged his conviction, arguing that the law exceeded Congress's power under the Commerce Clause. In a five-to-four decision, the Supreme Court agreed with Lopez and struck down the law.
Final answer: The United States v. Lopez decision reflects a delegation of power from the federal government to state governments, thereby increasing state and local sovereignty.
United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995). United States v. Lopez (93-1260), 514 U.S. 549 (1995).
5–4 decision Yes. The possession of a gun in a local school zone is not an economic activity that might, through repetition elsewhere, have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. The law is a criminal statute that has nothing to do with "commerce" or any sort of economic activity.
The issue in this case is whether the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to enact a statute that makes it a crime to possess a gun in, or near, a school. . . . In my view, the statute falls well within the scope of the commerce power as this Court has understood that power over the last half century. . . .
Related Cases Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964). Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964). Maryland v. Wirtz, 392 U.S. 183 (1968). League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 183 (1968). Garcia v. Gregory v.
