This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
Amendment Of Us V Lopez In Florida
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000280
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Lopez argues that section 922(q) exceeds Congress' delegated powers and violates the Tenth Amendment. The government counters that section 922(q) is a permissible exercise of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause.
In United States v. Lopez (1995), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had exceeded its constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause when it passed a law prohibiting gun possession in local school zones.
Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995) Gun possession is not an economic activity that has any impact on interstate commerce, whether direct or indirect, so the federal government cannot base a law prohibiting gun possession near schools on the Commerce Clause.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3: The Congress shall have Power . . . To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; . . .
Related Cases Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964). Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964). Maryland v. Wirtz, 392 U.S. 183 (1968). League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 183 (1968). Garcia v. Gregory v.
4.4 Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment.
United States v. Lopez (93-1260), 514 U.S. 549 (1995).
Lopez argues that section 922(q) exceeds Congress' delegated powers and violates the Tenth Amendment. The government counters that section 922(q) is a permissible exercise of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause.
The issue in this case is whether the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to enact a statute that makes it a crime to possess a gun in, or near, a school. . . . In my view, the statute falls well within the scope of the commerce power as this Court has understood that power over the last half century. . . .
More info
Appellant Zachary Lopez appeals his convictions and 84month total sentence for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. After the Lopez decision, the GFSZA was amended to specifically only apply to guns that had been moved via interstate or foreign commerce.The landmark 1995 case centered around 12th-grader Alfonso Lopez. The San Antonio student was arrested for carrying a concealed handgun and bullets to school. The Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 decision that Lopez was correct. The Commerce Clause, which grants Congress the power to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes. Defendent was charged with violating the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which prohibited the carrying of firearms in school zones. A 12th grade student (Lopez) was convicted of violating the Act when he brought a handgun to his high school. Synopsis of Rule of Law. 1995) (discussing a federal carjacking statute in light of Lopez); United States v.