This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
Amendment Of Us V Lopez In Santa Clara
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Santa Clara
Control #:
US-000280
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
The Framers intended the Tenth Amendment to confirm that the federal government was a limited government of enumerated powers. Any powers the Constitution does not delegate to the federal government are reserved for state and local governments.
The issue in this case is whether the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to enact a statute that makes it a crime to possess a gun in, or near, a school. . . . In my view, the statute falls well within the scope of the commerce power as this Court has understood that power over the last half century. . . .
Lopez argues that section 922(q) exceeds Congress' delegated powers and violates the Tenth Amendment. The government counters that section 922(q) is a permissible exercise of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause.
5–4 decision The possession of a gun in a local school zone is not an economic activity that might, through repetition elsewhere, have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. The law is a criminal statute that has nothing to do with "commerce" or any sort of economic activity.
Related Cases Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964). Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964). Maryland v. Wirtz, 392 U.S. 183 (1968). League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 183 (1968). Garcia v. Gregory v.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3: The Congress shall have Power . . . To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; . . .
In United States v. Lopez (1995), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had exceeded its constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause when it passed a law prohibiting gun possession in local school zones.
M81 means Department 81 at the Central Arraignment Courthouse located at 429 Bauchet Street, near the actual jail facility downtown.
County of San Mateo. Traffic Division. 500 County Center. Redwood City, CA 94063. (Court Code: 41470)
Court Codes CountyCourt CodeCourt Name Santa Clara 43460 Palo Alto Courthouse Santa Clara 43471 Santa Clara Courthouse Santa Clara 43635 South County Morgan Hill Courthouse Santa Cruz 44460 Santa Cruz Courthouse122 more rows
More info
A case in which the Court found the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act unconstitutional for overstepping the congressional boundaries of the Commerce Clause. Defendent was charged with violating the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which prohibited the carrying of firearms in school zones.In a five-to-four decision, the Supreme Court agreed with Lopez and struck down the law. He has the right to the effective assistance of counsel and to confront witnesses against him under the 6th. Amendment. The Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office (hereafter. "Amicus") initiated prosecution of Defendant and Respondent Duvanh. Alfonzo Lopez, a 12th grade high school student, carried a concealed weapon into his San Antonio, Texas high school. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Trump, No. -cv-00574-WHO, (N. Vacate and supporting documents filed in the Superior Court of the State of.