This form is a Complaint. This action was filed by the plaintiff due to a strip search which was conducted upon his/her person after an arrest. The plaintiff requests that he/she be awarded compensatory damages and punitive damages for the alleged violation of his/her constitutional rights.
Search Amendment With Schools In North Carolina
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000282
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
This website is not affiliated with any governmental entity
Public form
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
The broad authority of school administrators over student behavior, school safety, and the learning environment requires that school officials have the power to stop a minor student in order to ask questions or conduct an investigation, even in the absence of reasonable suspicion, so long as such authority is not ...
However, the 10th Amendment reserves the power to govern education to the states, allowing them to set their policies and regulations.
While education may not be a "fundamental right" under the Constitution, the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment requires that when a state establishes a public school system (as in Texas), no child living in that state may be denied equal access to schooling.
The circumstances under which the law deems a warrantless search, seizure, or arrest reasonable generally fall within the following seven categories: For a felony arrest in a public place. When directly related to a lawful arrest. During a traffic stop for reasonable suspicion.
An item is subject to seizure pursuant to a search warrant if there is probable cause to believe that it: (1) Is stolen or embezzled; or (2) Is contraband or otherwise unlawfully possessed; or (3) Has been used or is possessed for the purpose of being used to commit or conceal the commission of a crime; or (4) ...
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
A: In the United States, including California, the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination applies to criminal proceedings, not to academic settings like high schools.
The Fourth Amendment applies to searches conducted by public school officials because “school officials act as representatives of the State, not merely as surrogates for the parents.” 350 However, “the school setting requires some easing of the restrictions to which searches by public authorities are ordinarily subject ...
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of evidence that was obtained in violation of a person's constitutional rights. If a school search is found to be unlawful or in violation of a student's Fourth Amendment rights, the evidence obtained during the search may be suppressed.
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.