• US Legal Forms

Use Of Deception In Research In Washington

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000289
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document is a legal complaint filed in the United States District Court, detailing a case related to the use of deception in research within the context of insurance practices. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants, two insurance corporations, engaged in fraudulent misrepresentation and concealment regarding a life insurance policy purchased by the plaintiff, particularly related to the supposed 'vanishing premium' feature. Key features of this document include the identification of parties, a clear presentation of the alleged fraudulent practices, and a demand for both actual and punitive damages due to the defendants' deceptive actions. The form instructs the plaintiff to fill in specific information regarding personal and corporate details, as well as monetary demands, which allows for easy customization. It serves as a template for similar cases, making it relevant for attorneys who specialize in insurance fraud, legal partners, and paralegals handling similar complaints. By accurately detailing claims of deceit, the form is invaluable for those tasked with pursuing justice in cases of fraudulent insurance practices. Its instructional nature aids users in effectively editing and filling in relevant information while remaining compliant with legal standards. Overall, it acts as a crucial tool for legal professionals seeking to address deceptive practices in the insurance market.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand
  • Preview Complaint For Negligence - Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices in Sale of Insurance - Jury Trial Demand

Form popularity

FAQ

Examples of Active Deceptive Research An anxiety study, in which participants are told to expect mild pain during the course of the study, but no painful procedures are administered.

Deception or incomplete disclosure should only be used when no reasonably effective, alternative methods are available to achieve the goals of the research. Only study procedures that involve minimal risks (as determined by the IRB) can include deception or incomplete disclosure.

Deception is when a researcher gives false information to subjects or intentionally misleads them about some key aspect of the research. Examples include: Subjects complete a quiz, and are falsely told that they did very poorly, regardless of their actual performance.

Deception studies provide participants with an alternative explanation for the purpose of the study or provide them with misleading information about the study. Some studies may not directly deceive the participant but will withhold some information, such as the reason why a participant was selected for the study.

Deception in psychological research is often stated as acceptable only when all of the following conditions are met: 1) no other nondeceptive method exists to study the phenomenon of interest; 2) the study makes significant contributions to scientific knowledge; 3) the deception is not expected to cause significant ...

Deception should only be used when its use is the only way to answer the research question. Research plans that involve the use of deception must be adequately justified and, in most cases, will require that research participants be informed about the deception at the conclusion of their participation.

The IRB discourages the use of deception when: Alternative methods can be used that will yield valid study results. The deception deprives participants of the opportunity to protect their own interests. The missing information affects the participants' ability to assess the risks of participation.

Deception in psychological research is often stated as acceptable only when all of the following conditions are met: 1) no other nondeceptive method exists to study the phenomenon of interest; 2) the study makes significant contributions to scientific knowledge; 3) the deception is not expected to cause significant ...

Federal regulations prohibit the use of deceptive techniques that place participants at greater than minimal risk. An investigator proposing to use deception or incomplete disclosure should justify the use of deception and explain why deception is necessary to achieve the goals of the study.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Use Of Deception In Research In Washington