Rachel Spivack worked at the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office (DAO) and was subject to its COVID19 vaccine mandate. This ruling is the latest example of a court backing employers who choose to implement workplace safety policies requiring COVID19 vaccines or testing.The ADA requires employers to keep confidential any medical information they learn about any applicant or employee. Employers are entitled to ask how an employee's religious beliefs conflict with a COVID19 vaccination requirement. In August 2021, Defendant implemented a policy mandating all employees be vaccinated against COVID19. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et. seq. The second big exemption in Federal law is obviously under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which says it's unlawful to discriminate based upon. Of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). ("Title VII") and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 P.S. § 951 et seq. ("PHRA"). In particular, employers may want to keep an eye on developments at the state level.