Interference With Attorney Client Relationship In Nevada
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
A person is liable for “intentional interference with contractual relations” in Nevada when he or she unjustly causes someone else to breach a contract. The plaintiff may be able to sue for compensatory damages to make up for lost earnings. A judge can also award punitive damages to punish the perpetrator.
Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions (a)Motion for an Order Compelling Disclosure or Discovery. (1)In General. On notice to other parties and all affected persons, a party may move for an order compelling disclosure or discovery.
In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order.
Rule 7.2A. (a) Filing requirements. A Lawyer or law firm shall file with the state bar: (1) a copy or recording of all advertisements disseminated in exchange for something of value; and (2) written or recorded communications the lawyer causes to be disseminated for the purpose of advertising legal services.
Rule 7.1. Communications Concerning a Lawyer's Services. A communication is false or misleading if it contains a material misrepresentation of fact or law, or omits a fact necessary to make the statement considered as a whole not materially misleading.
Rule 7.2 - Right to Release (a)Before Conviction; Bailable Offenses. (1)Presumption of Innocence. A defendant charged with a crime but not yet convicted is presumed to be innocent. (2)Right to Release.
A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.
Cond. 3.5A. When a lawyer knows or reasonably should know the identity of a lawyer representing an opposing party, he or she should not take advantage of the lawyer by causing any default or dismissal to be entered without first inquiring about the opposing lawyer's intention to proceed.