Attorney Client Privilege With Board Of Directors In Texas

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document is a complaint filed in a Texas Circuit Court regarding the interference with attorney-client privilege and patient-physician confidentiality. It alleges that defendants, including a corporation and its employees, engaged in ex parte communications with the plaintiff's doctors without authorization. This resulted in damages to the plaintiff, including emotional distress and interference with the treatment process. Key features of the document include a structured outline of the parties involved, specific incidents leading to the complaint, and requests for both compensatory and punitive damages. To fill and edit the form, users should ensure accuracy in party identification, dates, and incident descriptions. This form is particularly useful for attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants involved in similar legal disputes. It serves as a template for asserting claims related to violations of attorney-client and patient-physician privileges, promoting clarity in legal proceedings.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship

Form popularity

FAQ

Exceptions include communications relating to the death of a client or disputes between the lawyer and client, among others. Clients should be very hesitant to reveal privileged information and should almost always consult an attorney before doing so.

The offensive-use doctrine waives privilege when the party requesting discovery establishes: (1) the party asserting the privilege seeks affirmative relief; (2) the privileged material is such that, if believed by the trier of fact, in all probability would be outcome determinative; and (3) disclosure of the material ...

In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order.

Some states have enacted a non-evidentiary accountant–client privilege. For example, Texas has a privilege rule that requires that a certified public accountant (CPA) not voluntarily disclose information communicated to the CPA by a client in connection with the engagement without the client's permission.

The common interest doctrine allows independently represented parties with a common legal interest to share information with each other without waiving the attorney-client privilege if a joint defense effort, or strategy, has been decided upon.

In Texas, most insurance policies include permissive use clauses, meaning the vehicle is covered when driven by someone other than the owner, as long as the owner gives permission. However, if the driver was using the vehicle without permission, they could be personally responsible for all damages.

There are also various circumstances under which privileged communication can be waived, either deliberately or unintentionally. Commonly cited relationships where privileged communication exists are those between attorney and client, doctor–or therapist–and patient, and priest and parishioner.

The "law of the case" doctrine is defined as that principle under which questions of law decided on appeal to a court of last resort will govern the case throughout its subsequent stages. Trevino v. Turcotte, 564 S.W. 2d 682, 685 (Tex.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Attorney Client Privilege With Board Of Directors In Texas