Interference With Attorney Client Relationship In Virginia

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000295
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

The document is a legal complaint filed in the Circuit Court of Virginia, addressing the issue of interference with the attorney-client relationship. In this case, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants engaged in ex parte communications with the plaintiff's treating physicians and the plaintiff himself, despite prior requests from the plaintiff's attorney to cease such contact. The complaint highlights the actions as intentional and harmful, resulting in emotional distress and damages to the plaintiff. The key features of the document include the allegations of wrongful conduct by the defendants, the request for compensatory and punitive damages, and the emphasis on the breach of patient/physician privilege. Filling out this form requires detailed information about the parties involved and a clear articulation of the events leading to the interference. It is particularly useful for attorneys, partners, owners, associates, paralegals, and legal assistants who are engaged in litigation cases involving claims of interference in legal representation. The form helps to structure the plaintiff's claims and provides a basis for seeking legal remedies against defendants who undermine the attorney-client relationship.
Free preview
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Preview Complaint For Intentional Interference With Attorney-Client Relationship

Form popularity

FAQ

In Virginia, a claim for tortious interference arises when (a) there is a valid contract or business expectancy between the plaintiff and a party other than the defendant, (b) someone who is not a party to the contract (the defendant) has knowledge of its existence, (c) the defendant intentionally causes the contract ...

(1) A party is under a duty promptly to amend and/or supplement all responses to discovery requests directly addressed to (A) the identity and location of persons having knowledge of discoverable matters, and (B) the identity of each person expected to be called as an expert witness at trial, the subject matter on ...

RULE 7.1 Communications Concerning A Lawyer's Services A communication is false or misleading if it contains a material misrepresentation of fact or law, or omits a fact when omission of such fact makes the statement materially false or misleading as a whole.

The 21-Day Rule: Why Time Is Critical for Post-Trial Relief Under Virginia Supreme Court Rule , a circuit court loses jurisdiction over a case 21 days after entry of a final order unless action is taken to suspend or vacate the order.

(a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority.

The Rule provides: In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized by law to do so.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Interference With Attorney Client Relationship In Virginia