Examples of parent and carer discrimination in the workplace Workplace policy that denies a bonus to employees who have taken leave due to their carer responsibilities. Dismissing someone who has caring responsibilities for a relative. Only allowing mothers to work flexibly and expecting fathers to work full time.
§ § 6301—6385. Child—A person under 18 years of age.
Parent or carer discrimination is when someone treats you unfairly, including bullying you, because you are a parent or carer.
Giving parents work schedules that they cannot meet for childcare reasons while giving nonparents flexible schedules; Fabricating work infractions or performance deficiencies to justify dismissal of employees with family responsibilities; Penalizing workers who have legally taken time off to care for aging parents; or.
The law applies only to workers who are 40 and older (29 U.S.C. §§ 633(a)). The law prohibits discrimination based on age for hiring, promotion, layoffs, benefits or other employment decisions. A person, for example, may not be laid off because they are older and nearing retirement.
Definition. Discrimination happens when a person, or a group of people, is treated less favourably than another person or group because of their background or certain personal characteristics.
Direct evidence often involves a statement from a decision-maker that expresses a discriminatory motive. Direct evidence can also include express or admitted classifications, in which a recipient explicitly distributes benefits or burdens based on race, color, or national origin.
If you feel you have experienced illegal discrimination, you can file a complaint or report a bias incident to the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (PHRC). Email the PHRC or call your regional office.
However, discrimination is a state of mind and, therefore, notoriously hard to prove. Sophisticated employers are well aware that discrimination is illegal. Thus, most cases are established through circumstantial evidence.
Direct evidence often involves a statement from a decision-maker that expresses a discriminatory motive. Direct evidence can also include express or admitted classifications, in which a recipient explicitly distributes benefits or burdens based on race, color, or national origin.