A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The Second Amendment isn't about forming militias.If the Second Amendment protects an individual right of the people that shall not be infringed, who or what is the militia and how is it to be well-regulated? A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. These provisions indicate that the militia is of a size that will make complete. The law has also changed. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Of course, we no longer rely on civilian militias as a form of national defense. Richard Uviller and William G. Merkel argue the amendment has nothing to contribute to debates over private access to firearms.