This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
Second Amendment Rights For In Wake
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Wake
Control #:
US-000298
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
This website is not affiliated with any governmental entity
Public form
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
The California law requires applicants to demonstrate “good cause” for carrying a weapon, like working in a job with a security threat — a restriction sharply attacked by gun advocates as violating the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
Carrying a weapon for self-defense is never condemned in the Bible. In fact, Luke -38 mentions it in a positive light by Jesus Himself. Christians are called to submit to governing authorities, and they are to obey the laws of the land.
Government is expressly forbidden from attempting to infringe on it. The Declaration of Independence asserts that all men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. In other words, our rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are God-given, not government given.
Finally, as Jesus advised in Luke 22 a Christian may take prudent measures to mitigate potential risks, including taking self-defense courses, lawfully carrying weapons or even acting preemptively against a threat when required to protect life or property.
Out of this bloody travail, the Founders enshrined the God-given right to private firearm ownership in the Second Amendment as “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” U.S. Const. amend. II.
Andd so, the flip side though is that weapons that are "dangerous and unusual" do not get protection. So even if you might think, oh well that's fairly common. if it's dangerous and unusual. usually meaning if it's mostly used by those who are intent on doing harm unlawfully, then they're not going to be protected.
Cruikshank, one of the Court's holdings was that the Second Amendment only prevented the federal government from infringing on a person's right to bear arms. In other words, the Second Amendment's guarantees do not protect people from private actors or state governments that may try to prevent them from bearing arms.
In short, the Supreme Court did its job by announcing that the Second Amendment does not protect assault weapons—precisely because they are meant for the battlefield and are not “in common use at the time for lawful purposes.” Id. at 624-25, 627-28; Kolbe, 849 F. 3d at 131.
Federal law outlaws the possession of firearms or ammunition by several categories of people, including: convicted felons. anyone who's been convicted of a misdemeanor for domestic violence or is under a domestic violence restraining order.
More info
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Our analysis shows that even after Bruen, courts are upholding state, federal, and local gun laws against Second Amendment challenges.Most U.S. citizens have a Second Amendment right to own and carry firearms, but that doesn't mean all gun control is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that lawabiding Americans have a right to carry a handgun outside the home for selfdefense. Amendment guaranteed individuals a right to possess firearms for personal protection—rulings. As Congress looks for ways to address gun violence, Republicanappointed Supreme Court justices are pushing in the opposite direction. Guns in bars and restaurants. Like most other constitutional rights, the Second Amendment constrains only the government. In a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2008, District of Columbia v. In a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2008, District of Columbia v.