Wrongful Interference In A Business Relationship In Massachusetts
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Tortious interference with a business relationship An example is when a tortfeasor offers to sell a property to someone below market value knowing they were in the final stages of a sale with a third party pending the upcoming settlement date to formalize the sale writing.
For example, if a competitor spreads false rumors about a business to intentionally harm its reputation and steal customers, it could be considered wrongful interference with a business relationship.
Under Massachusetts law, to prove that a defendant had the requisite intent to interfere, the plaintiff must show that the defendant had knowledge of the contract or business relationship and knew that they were interfering with its performance when they undertook the alleged tortious act (Walker v. Waltham Hous.
If a non-contracting person wrongfully interferes with your business relationships (handshake or formal agreement), with an intent to cause economic harm, you may have tortious interference claims against the person.
Interfering or obstructing a public business establishment is a misdemeanor level offense. Those convicted of this offense can be sentenced to 90 days in jail, community labor or community service, expensive court fines and any other conditions of probation that a judge may consider suitable.
If a third party interferes with a contract or business relationship, it may be tortious interference in a business relationship. Some examples of actionable interference may include convincing a shared supplier to renege on a contract or a third party interrupting the sale of property to a business.
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...
Massachusetts courts have permitted a tortious interference claim against a supervisor or company official who interferes with a plaintiff's employment relationship, when the interference was motivated by actual malice unrelated to the employer's legitimate business interest (O'Brien v. New Eng. Tel.
