This is a Complaint pleading for use in litigation of the title matter. Adapt this form to comply with your facts and circumstances, and with your specific state law. Not recommended for use by non-attorneys.
Wrongful Interference With A Contractual Relationship Occurs When In Massachusetts
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000303
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Free preview
Form popularity
FAQ
Under Massachusetts law, to prove that a defendant had the requisite intent to interfere, the plaintiff must show that the defendant had knowledge of the contract or business relationship and knew that they were interfering with its performance when they undertook the alleged tortious act (Walker v. Waltham Hous.
(1) the existence of a valid contractual relationship or business expectancy; (2) that defendants had knowledge of that relationship; (3) an intentional interference inducing or causing a breach or termination of the relationship or expectancy; (4) that defendants interfered for an improper purpose or used improper ...
Interference with contract, also known as “tortious interference,” is a cause of action that can be brought to protect parties to a contract from unjustifiable interference by third parties who want to interfere, disrupt or destroy the contract.
A plaintiff must show that: (1) the defendant interfered with the plaintiff's prospective economic relationship; (2) the plaintiff would have entered that economic relationship in the absence of the defendant's conduct; (3) the plaintiff was injured; and (4) the defendant acted with the sole purpose of harming the ...
Tortious interference is a common law tort allowing a claim for damages against a defendant who wrongfully and intentionally interferes with the plaintiff's contractual or business relationships. See also intentional interference with contractual relations .
As an example, someone could use blackmail to induce a contractor into breaking a contract; they could threaten a supplier to prevent them from supplying goods or services to another party; or they could obstruct someone's ability to honor a contract with a client by deliberately refusing to deliver necessary goods.
Under Massachusetts law, to prove that a defendant had the requisite intent to interfere, the plaintiff must show that the defendant had knowledge of the contract or business relationship and knew that they were interfering with its performance when they undertook the alleged tortious act (Walker v. Waltham Hous.
Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party, causing economic harm.
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...