The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that "tortious interference with prospective economic advantage" is a viable claim under Minnesota law. In Minnesota, a claim can be brought for the wrongful interference with noncontractual as well as contractual business relationships.336.2A-512, LESSEE'S DUTIES AS TO RIGHTFULLY REJECTED GOODS. Wrongful or tortious interference with contracts happens when a thirdparty intentionally causes a contracting party to commit a breach of contract. Tortious interference with prospective economic advantage is a viable claim in Minnesota. A cause of action includes all essential facts that the plaintiff must establish to demonstrate their legal right to relief. We argue that the tort should be repudiated. 6, Unfair Trade Practices; Ch. 7, False Statements in a Business Context; and Ch. 11, Franchise Law. As long as the interference results in the parties' contractual relationship being harmed, tortious interference might be in play. I. Is tortious interference with prospective advantage a valid tort claim under Minnesota law?