Wrongful Interference In A Contractual Relationship In Washington
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
Whenever a third person through some act, such as harming or destroying persons or property, makes performance of a contract more burdensome, or impos- sible, or renders performance of less or no value to the person entitled to it, a cause of action in tort arises for the interference with the contractual relations.
(1) the existence of a valid contractual relationship or business expectancy; (2) that defendants had knowledge of that relationship; (3) an intentional interference inducing or causing a breach or termination of the relationship or expectancy; (4) that defendants interfered for an improper purpose or used improper ...
Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party, causing economic harm.
Tortious interference is when a party outside of a contract or business relationship interferes with your economic advantage or business contracts in a 'wrongful' manner. The law provides recourse through a claim for tortious interference with contractual or economic advantage.
Tortious interference is a common law tort allowing a claim for damages against a defendant who wrongfully and intentionally interferes with the plaintiff's contractual or business relationships.
A contractual relationship is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. Each party agrees to fulfill certain obligations in exchange for receiving specified benefits or considerations.
Tortious interference with a business relationship An example is when a tortfeasor offers to sell a property to someone below market value knowing they were in the final stages of a sale with a third party pending the upcoming settlement date to formalize the sale writing.
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...
The requisite elements of tortious interference with contract claim are: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract between plaintiff and another; (2) defendant's awareness of the contractual relationship; (3) defendant's intentional and unjustified inducement of a breach of the contract; (4) a subsequent ...
Some examples of improper conduct are the use of fraud or misrepresentation, trade libel, trademark infringement, blackmail, economic pressure, initiating civil lawsuits or criminal prosecutions, and even physical violence.
