If a party to an arbitration wishes to challenge an award for any reason, they need to make an application to a court except in the rare case where the parties' agreement provides for some type of appellate proceeding within the arbitration.
Under the Federal Arbitration Act, which governs most arbitrations, a party may petition a court to modify or vacate an arbitration award, but the grounds are extremely narrow — basically that the arbitrator was corrupt, evidently partial, engaged in misconduct regarding evidence or scheduling, or exceeded his or her ...
Within 60 days after the arbitration award is filed with the clerk of the court, a party may request a trial by filing with the clerk a request for trial, with proof of service of a copy upon all other parties appearing in the case.
Under federal and state laws, there are only a few ways to challenge an arbitrator's award. The Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and some state laws provide the reasons why an award can be vacated (thrown out), modified (changed), or corrected. Those reasons are very limited in general.
The California Arbitration Act has a provision that allows the parties to petition a court to compel arbitration in agreement with a signed arbitration agreement unless the right to compel has been waived or there are grounds to rescind the agreement.
The merits of the dispute are not considered and the award can only be vacated where: (1) the award was procured by fraud or corruption; (2) there was corruption in the arbitrator; (3) the arbitrator committed misconduct resulting in substantial prejudice; (4) the arbitrators exceeded their powers; (5) the arbitrator ...
The decision in Cook v. USC, 102 Cal. App. 5th 312 (2024), reh'g denied (June 13, 2024), has therefore become binding law in California and may warrant employers reviewing their arbitration agreements to ensure they do not contain the provisions that rendered USC's agreement unenforceable.
Once an arbitrator issues an award, either an agency or a union may appeal the arbitrator's award by filing an "exception" with the Authority within 30 days after the date on which the Arbitrator served the award on the parties.
Under the FAA, an award may be set aside if (1) the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; (2) there was evident partiality or corruption by the arbitrators; (3) the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing for sufficient cause, in refusing to hear pertinent and ...