Federal Arbitration Act Grounds For Appeal Of Award In Dallas
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
The Court opined that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) establishes liberal federal policy favoring arbitration agreements, and such agreements may only be overridden when there is a contrary Congressional command. CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood, 132 S.
The appeal must be commenced within thirty (30) days of the date on which the original award is submitted to the parties and only on the grounds that the original award is based upon “(1) an error of law that is material and prejudicial; or (2) determinations of fact that are clearly erroneous.”11 AAA will then arrange ...
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 37 provides for filing of appeals against orders of the Court or for that matter an Arbitrator. Three Judges bench of the Supreme Court of India of Justices R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha, and K.M.
The statutory grounds for vacating an arbitration award under Section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act and state counterparts are limited to matters such as arbitrator corruption, fraud, evident partiality, misconduct and exceeding of powers. These grounds do not go to the merits of the award.
Decisions indicate that a court may review an arbitrator's award if it appears that the arbitrator substituted his judgment for that of the parties, the award does not draw its essence from the contract, the award contains material error, and the award is against public law or policy.
A Texas court that has jurisdiction over the parties and the dispute may enforce an arbitration agreement and render judgment on the award (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.
The merits of the dispute are not considered and the award can only be vacated where: (1) the award was procured by fraud or corruption; (2) there was corruption in the arbitrator; (3) the arbitrator committed misconduct resulting in substantial prejudice; (4) the arbitrators exceeded their powers; (5) the arbitrator ...