If you decide to challenge an arbitration decision in federal court, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires you to act quickly. Under the FAA, you must file a motion to vacate within three months of the date the arbitrator filed or delivered the decision.
In California, errors of law committed by the arbitrator, no matter how substantial, are generally not grounds for challenging the arbitrator's award. The rationale is because the parties have agreed that the arbitrator's decision, whether right or wrong, would be final and conclusive.
Generally, it must first be noted that neither the Federal Arbitration Act nor the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act mentions the issue of statutes of limitation. Moreover, only a few state courts have addressed this issue, and there is no unanimity among them.
Yes, to appeal your 'civil' case you must file a Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of Magistrate Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of judgment by the Court. (Appeals from dispossessory cases have to be filed within seven (7) days and follow a different format.)
The answer is yes, through a process called vacatur, i.e., having the award vacated or canceled. The vacatur process is set forth in two statutes: the Federal Arbitration Act and the applicable state arbitration act governing the dispute. Depending on the case, one or both statutes may be applicable.
Under the Federal Arbitration Act, which governs most arbitrations, a party may petition a court to modify or vacate an arbitration award, but the grounds are extremely narrow — basically that the arbitrator was corrupt, evidently partial, engaged in misconduct regarding evidence or scheduling, or exceeded his or her ...
The grounds for attacking an arbitration award under common law are listed; they include fraud, misconduct, and gross unfairness by the arbitrator.
§ 5-3-20 that appeals to superior court must be filed "within 30 days of the date the judgment, order, or decision complained of was entered" is not a statute of limitation but is jurisdictional in nature. Rowell v. Parker, 192 Ga. App.
Under the FAA, an award may be set aside if (1) the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; (2) there was evident partiality or corruption by the arbitrators; (3) the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing for sufficient cause, in refusing to hear pertinent and ...