Arbitration Case Of The Philippines Against China In Harris

State:
Multi-State
County:
Harris
Control #:
US-0011BG
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

After receiving the case submission form, each party will then be sent explanatory materials and preliminary documents.
Free preview
  • Form preview
  • Form preview

Form popularity

FAQ

China adopted a position of non-acceptance and non-participation in the proceedings. The Permanent Court of Arbitration served as Registry in this arbitration.

The PCA is constituted through two separate multilateral conventions with a combined membership of 124 Contracting Parties. The PCA is not a United Nations agency, but has been a United Nations observer since 1993.

The existing PRC Arbitration Law requires a valid arbitration agreement to include a specific designation of an arbitration commission (Article 16). The law further sets out stringent requirements on the establishment of an “arbitration commission” in China at the provincial and municipal levels (Article 10).

In essence, the tribunal adjudicated in favour of the Philippines. It ruled against Chinese entitlements over the islands. Since the islands were posited under the EEZ of the Philippines, China's actions were discerned as violating the sovereign rights of the Philippines, via infractions over their EEZ lines.

The PCA is an intergovernmental organization with 124 Contracting Parties.

On July 12, 2016, the arbitral tribunal adjudicating the Philippines' case against China in the South China Sea ruled overwhelmingly in favor of the Philippines, determining that major elements of China's claim—including its nine-dash line, recent land reclamation activities, and other activities in Philippine waters— ...

Philippines-China relations have lately been dominated by the territorial disputes in the West Philippine Sea, which has escalated since the naval standoff over the Scarborough Shoal in April 2012 and aggravated by issues of Chinese illegal occupation, unlawful establishment of infrastructures, and incidents of ...

The Philippines' formal claims, and proclaimed so in a 1978 decree by President Marcos, on certain land features in the Spratlys islands group in the South China Sea, called the Kalayan (“Freedom” in Filipino) Group, have been made under the doctrine of Res nullius (ineffective sovereignty) and their geographical ...

On 29 October 2015, the PCA published the award by the arbitral tribunal on Jurisdiction and Admissibility for the case. The award favored the Philippines on most of its contentions. The tribunal found that it has jurisdiction to consider the following seven Philippines' Submissions.

More info

The arbitration concerned the role of historic rights and the source of maritime entitlements in the South China Sea. Of the competing claims, the one with the highest potential for military conflict concerns Chinese activity in the area the.The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague rules in favor of the Philippines in a case opened in 2013 against the People's Republic of China. The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague rules in favor of the Philippines in a case opened in 2013 against the People's Republic of China. On 12 July 2016, the Arbitral Tribunal in the South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Arbitration Case Of The Philippines Against China In Harris