What is the Permanent Court of Arbitration decision in the Philippines versus China case on the territorial dispute over the West Philippine Sea?

In its ruling, the Tribunal firmly rejected any PRC territorial or maritime claim to areas determined by the Tribunal to be part of the Philippines' exclusive economic zone and continental shelf. As provided under the Convention, the 2016 arbitral decision is final and legally binding on the PRC and the Philippines.

US Legal Forms
Arbitration Case Submission Form

Arbitration Case Of The Philippines Against China In San Antonio

Category:

Arbitration and Mediation - Contracts

State:

Multi-State

City:

San Antonio

Control #:

US-0011BG

Format:

Instant download

Description

After receiving the case submission form, each party will then be sent explanatory materials and preliminary documents.

View Master agreement for services in Ohio

View this form

View Master agreement for services in Allegheny

View this form

View Master agreement for services in Philadelphia

View this form

View Master agreement for services in Cuyahoga

View this form

View Master agreement for services in Franklin

View this form

Form Rating

4.83

Satisfied(292)

Form popularity

FAQ

In its ruling, the Tribunal firmly rejected any PRC territorial or maritime claim to areas determined by the Tribunal to be part of the Philippines' exclusive economic zone and continental shelf. As provided under the Convention, the 2016 arbitral decision is final and legally binding on the PRC and the Philippines.

What's the difference between mediation and arbitration? In a mediation process, a neutral, trained mediator works to help disputants come to a consensus on their own. In arbitration, a neutral, trained arbitrator serves as a judge who is responsible for resolving the dispute.

Arbitration in the Philippines is governed principally by Republic Act No. 9285, otherwise known as the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 (“RA 9285” or the “ADR Act”). RA 9285 was enacted on February 4, 2004 and primarily adopted: (1) Republic Act No.

On July 12, 2016, the arbitral tribunal adjudicating the Philippines' case against China in the South China Sea ruled overwhelmingly in favor of the Philippines, determining that major elements of China's claim—including its nine-dash line, recent land reclamation activities, and other activities in Philippine waters— ...

The Philippines' formal claims, and proclaimed so in a 1978 decree by President Marcos, on certain land features in the Spratlys islands group in the South China Sea, called the Kalayan (“Freedom” in Filipino) Group, have been made under the doctrine of Res nullius (ineffective sovereignty) and their geographical ...

Seat of Arbitration. If the parties have not previously agreed on the seat of arbitration, the seat of arbitration shall be the Philippines, unless the arbitral tribunal, having regard to the circumstances of the case, determines that another seat is more appropriate.

A domestic arbitral award when confirmed shall be enforced in the same manner as final and executory decisions of the Regional Trial Court. The confirmation of a domestic award shall be made by the regional trial court in ance with the Rules of Procedure to be promulgated by the Supreme Court.

Yes, Philippine courts have the power to issue the following interim measures of protection relating to an arbitration: (a) preliminary injunction directed against a party to an arbitration, (b) preliminary attachment against property or garnishment of funds in the custody of a bank or third person, (c) appointment of ...

Philippines-China relations have lately been dominated by the territorial disputes in the West Philippine Sea, which has escalated since the naval standoff over the Scarborough Shoal in April 2012 and aggravated by issues of Chinese illegal occupation, unlawful establishment of infrastructures, and incidents of ...

More info

The arbitration concerned the role of historic rights and the source of maritime entitlements in the South China Sea. The Guangzhou Court affirmed the validity of the arbitration clause in the Sales Agreement on February 22, 2012.China states that the Arbitral Tribunal lacks jurisdiction in the case. Feb 19, 2013. Location. Find your regional AAA-ICDR office location. Please click on a city for more details. On 12 July 2016, the Arbitral Tribunal in the South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v.

Arbitration Case Of The Philippines Against China In San Antonio

Description

Related forms

Show more info

Form Rating

Form popularity

FAQ

What is the Permanent Court of Arbitration decision in the Philippines versus China case on the territorial dispute over the West Philippine Sea?

What is the difference between arbitration and mediation in the Philippines?

Is arbitration legal in Philippines?

What is the arbitral decision in the Philippines vs China?

What is the legal basis for the Philippines claims in the South China Sea?

What is the seat of arbitration in the Philippines?

How is an arbitration award enforced in the Philippines?

Is arbitrage legal in the Philippines?

What is the territorial dispute between China and the Philippines?

More info

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies