Arbitration Case Of The Philippines Against China In Travis

State:
Multi-State
County:
Travis
Control #:
US-0011BG
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

After receiving the case submission form, each party will then be sent explanatory materials and preliminary documents.
Free preview
  • Form preview
  • Form preview

Form popularity

FAQ

The nine-dash line, also referred to as the eleven-dash line by Taiwan, is a set of line segments on various maps that accompanied the claims of the People's Republic of China (PRC, "Mainland China") and the Republic of China (ROC, "Taiwan") in the South China Sea.

In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration issued a decision confirming that the Philippines has sovereign rights over its 200 miles Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the West Philippine Sea.

Philippines-China relations have lately been dominated by the territorial disputes in the West Philippine Sea, which has escalated since the naval standoff over the Scarborough Shoal in April 2012 and aggravated by issues of Chinese illegal occupation, unlawful establishment of infrastructures, and incidents of ...

The Philippines' formal claims, and proclaimed so in a 1978 decree by President Marcos, on certain land features in the Spratlys islands group in the South China Sea, called the Kalayan (“Freedom” in Filipino) Group, have been made under the doctrine of Res nullius (ineffective sovereignty) and their geographical ...

Arbitration is a way of settling a dispute without having to go to court. You are called the claimant and the party you're taking action against is the respondent. You both put your case to an independent person called an arbitrator.

Summary of Claims The Philippines claims the northeastern section of the Spratly Islands as the Kalayaan Island Group, in addition to the Scarborough Shoal, which it calls the Bajo de Masinloc. Malaysia claims part of the Kalayaan Island, while China and Taiwan claim the entirety of the island group.

On July 12, 2016, the arbitral tribunal adjudicating the Philippines' case against China in the South China Sea ruled overwhelmingly in favor of the Philippines, determining that major elements of China's claim—including its nine-dash line, recent land reclamation activities, and other activities in Philippine waters— ...

On July 12, 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled in favor of the Philippines in a case not involving naming.

In 2012, China seized Scarborough Shoal from the Philippines following a two-month standoff, and in recent years, Chinese coastguard and maritime militia vessels have attempted to block boats supplying food and water to troops garrisoned on a Filipino ship deliberately grounded on Second Thomas Shoal in 1999.

On 29 October 2015, the PCA published the award by the arbitral tribunal on Jurisdiction and Admissibility for the case. The award favored the Philippines on most of its contentions. The tribunal found that it has jurisdiction to consider the following seven Philippines' Submissions.

More info

The arbitration concerned the role of historic rights and the source of maritime entitlements in the South China Sea. It was pursuant to Part XV of, and Annex VII to, the Convention that the Philippines commenced this arbitration against China on 22 January.The Philippines initiated arbitration proceedings against China pursuant to. The tribunal considered China's arguments and in October 2015 found that it had jurisdiction to rule on 7 of the Philippines' 15 submissions. The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. China South China Sea arbitration. As provided in the Convention, the Tribunal's decision is final and legally binding on both China and the Philippines. What should the U.S. and its close allies do about China's strategic expansion into the South China Sea? Although China did not participate in the Philippines v. China arbitration case, China consistently justified participation based on legal arguments,.

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Arbitration Case Of The Philippines Against China In Travis