This form is a sample letter in Word format covering the subject matter of the title of the form.
No Contest Vs Guilty In Philadelphia
Category:
State:
Multi-State
County:
Philadelphia
Control #:
US-0018LTR
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
In California DUI cases, you might consider a “no-contest” plea instead of pleading guilty. This plea results in a conviction and sentencing, but it may be a better choice, especially if you're concerned about potential lawsuits related to your DUI.
If you believe the evidence against you is weak and wish to challenge the ticket, pleading not guilty may be the appropriate course of action. However, if you acknowledge that you were speeding but want to avoid the potential consequences of a trial, opting for a no contest plea might be more suitable.
The legal effect of such a plea, to a crime punishable as a felony, shall be the same as that of a plea of guilty for all purposes.
Read more. About 95% of felony convictions in the United States are obtained by guilty pleas (and at least as many misdemeanor convictions), but only 15% of known exonerees pled guilty (261/1,702). Innocent defendants who plead guilty have an exceptionally hard time convincing anybody of their innocence. Read more.
A plea of nolo contendre (latin for “I am unwilling to contest”) is a plea recognized in US law, but does not have any foundation in Canadian criminal law. It is prohibited by virtue of s. 606(1) which lists all valid pleas. A guilty plea that in substance amounts to a plea of nolo contendre will be invalid.
If you might face a civil case related to your alleged crime, a no-contest plea can help you avoid giving the plaintiff a powerful piece of evidence. On the other hand, a guilty plea might get you a better deal from the prosecution, but it's essential to weigh the potential for a civil lawsuit.
In all other respects, the consequences of a nolo contendere plea are the same as if you had pled guilty or were found guilty of those offenses. You will have a criminal record of conviction for the offenses underlying your nolo contendere plea.
No contest is the same as a guilty plea, period. It just can't be used against you in civil case.
If you plead "nolo contendere" (no contest) you stated that while you do not wish to plead guilty you agree that the prosecutor has sufficient evidence that the court would find you guilty. This is considered the same as pleading guilty as far as the conviction is concerned.
``No contest'' means you are not admitting guilt, but are accepting there is sufficient evidence to convict you. ``Guilty'' means you are admitting guilt. Either way, the court will sentence you for the crime.
More info
If you plead nolo contendere, you will be sentenced the same way you would be if you pleaded guilty. You are still considered guilty in the eyes of the law.Pleading "no contest" to a criminal charge means you do not admit fault. Neither are you trying to fight for your innocence in a criminal trial. The main distinction between "no contest" and "guilty" comes down to whether you accept responsibility for the offense or if you don't appeal a conviction. By pleading no contest, the court treats you the same as if you pled guilty, but no one can use your plea as evidence of guilt in future civil proceedings. In Pennsylvania, a criminal defendant may enter a plea of guilty, not guilty or, at the discretion of the court, "nolo contendere". Go to Philadelphia traffic Court and plead no contest and they will take the insurance points away and you will pay a fine. The advantage of doing one in CA anyway is that a no contest plea cannot be used against you in civil proceedings whereas a guilty plea can. Although somewhat less common, you can enter a no-contest plea.
