Notice For Discovery And Inspection In Maricopa
Description
Form popularity
FAQ
What Is the Discovery Rule in Arizona? Arizona applies the discovery rule in certain personal injury cases. Under this rule, the statute of limitations may begin from the date when the injury was discovered or when it reasonably should have been discovered.
Discovery. (a) Witnesses. Within twenty days of the filing of a response, disciplinary counsel and the judge shall exchange the names and addresses of all persons known to have knowledge of the relevant facts, designating those persons the parties intend to call at the hearing.
This rule freely authorizes the taking of depositions under the same circumstances and by the same methods whether for the purpose of discovery or for the purpose of obtaining evidence.
Rule 26.1 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure requires that the parties to a lawsuit to exchange Initial Disclosure Statements within 30 (thirty) days of the defendant filing an Answer.
One of the tools that a knowledgeable criminal defense attorney will use to defend your rights is the pre-trial discovery process when the defense can file a “Demand for Discovery and Inspection” requesting that the prosecution share its evidence with the defense.
The rule requires the parties conduct the meet and confer as soon as practicable, and in any event at least 21 days before the initial scheduling conference or order is due. A motion to dismiss does not generally stay discovery, so be ready to move for a stay or proceed with the FRCP 26(f) meet and confer.
A party who discovers additional evidence or material before or during trial must promptly disclose its existence to the other party or the court if: (1) the evidence or material is subject to discovery or inspection under this rule; and. (2) the other party previously requested, or the court ordered, its production.
ARIZONA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 26.2 The amount of discovery a party may take is limited by the tier to which their case is assigned. In addition, the days in which discovery is to be completed is limited by the tier to which their case is assigned.
The One Expert Rule is not meant to combat cumulative evidence, but rather its purpose is to reduce costs in presenting multiple expert witnesses. Arizona Rule of Evidence 403 addresses cumulative evidence and relevant evidence can be excluded if its probative value is outweighed by a danger of cumulative evidence.
