Keywords: right of first offer, right of first refusal, differences, types Detailed description: The rights of first offer (ROFL) and first refusal (ROAR) are commonly used contractual agreements that grant certain parties preferential treatment when it comes to purchasing or leasing property or assets. Although these two rights may seem similar on the surface, they carry specific distinctions that make them unique in their own ways. The main difference between the right of first offer and right of first refusal lies in the order of priority given to the parties involved. Firstly, the right of first offer grants the holder (typically a tenant or lessee) the right to be the first to receive an offer from the owner when the property or asset becomes available for sale or lease. However, the holder is not obligated to accept the offer and can negotiate the terms or even decline it entirely. This right ensures that the holder has the first opportunity to enter into negotiations. On the other hand, the right of first refusal gives the holder (often an existing tenant or business partner) the right to match any offers or terms presented by a third-party buyer or lessee. The holder has the option to accept the terms set by the third-party and enter into the agreement on the same conditions. If the holder chooses not to match the offer, they essentially waive their right, and the property can be sold or leased to the third party. Apart from the basic distinction, there are various types or variations of the right of first offer and right of first refusal that exist depending on the specific needs and agreements between the parties involved: 1. Right of first offer with a time limit: Here, the owner is required to provide the holder with an offer within a predetermined timeframe, after which the holder can freely seek alternative options. 2. Right of first refusal with a fixed price: In this case, the third-party buyer or lessee is obligated to present the holder with an offer at a predetermined price. The holder has the choice to match this price or refuse the offer altogether. 3. Hybrid rights: Sometimes, a combination of the right of first offer and right of first refusal is employed, allowing the holder to have first dibs on an offer and subsequently the right to match any outside offers. Understanding the differences between the right of first offer and right of first refusal is crucial for both parties involved in a property or asset transaction. It enables better decision-making, negotiation, and protection of one's interests.