If you need to comprehensive, download, or produce legitimate document layouts, use US Legal Forms, the greatest assortment of legitimate varieties, which can be found on the Internet. Utilize the site`s basic and hassle-free lookup to find the papers you want. Numerous layouts for enterprise and person purposes are sorted by groups and suggests, or keywords and phrases. Use US Legal Forms to find the Alaska Motion to Invoke the Rule Prior to Voir Dire and To Enjoin the District Attorney From Advising Witnesses of Previous Testimony in just a couple of mouse clicks.
In case you are presently a US Legal Forms customer, log in for your bank account and click the Acquire button to have the Alaska Motion to Invoke the Rule Prior to Voir Dire and To Enjoin the District Attorney From Advising Witnesses of Previous Testimony. You can also accessibility varieties you earlier downloaded from the My Forms tab of your bank account.
If you work with US Legal Forms the first time, follow the instructions under:
Every legitimate document design you acquire is your own property forever. You have acces to each and every develop you downloaded inside your acccount. Click the My Forms portion and choose a develop to produce or download again.
Compete and download, and produce the Alaska Motion to Invoke the Rule Prior to Voir Dire and To Enjoin the District Attorney From Advising Witnesses of Previous Testimony with US Legal Forms. There are millions of specialist and condition-certain varieties you can use to your enterprise or person requires.
1002. This rule, modeled after Federal Rule 1002, is the familiar part of the Best Evidence Rule requiring the production of the original to prove the contents of a writing, recording or photograph. See Rule 1001(1) and 1001(2) for definitions of the terms used in this rule.
402 Relevant Evidence Admissible?Exceptions?Irrelevant Evidence Inadmissible. 403 Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time. 404 Character Evidence Not Admissible to Prove Conduct?Exceptions?Other Crimes.
Evid. 609. Rule 609 - Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime (a)General Rule. For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime is only admissible if the crime involved dishonesty or false statement.
(a) If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qual- ified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.
The court shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1) make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth, (2) avoid needless consumption of time, and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue ...
As submitted by the Court, Rule 611(b) provided: A witness may be cross-examined on any matter relevant to any issue in the case, including credibility. In the interests of justice, the judge may limit cross-examination with respect to matters not testified to on direct examination.
Rule 35.1 - Post-Conviction Procedure (a)Scope . A person who has been convicted of or sentenced for a crime may institute a proceeding for post- conviction relief under AS 12.72. 010 - 12.72. (b)Not a Substitute for Remedies in Trial Court - Replaces All Other Remedies for Challenging the Validity of a Sentence.
Rule 11 - Pleas (a)Alternatives. A defendant may plead not guilty, guilty or nolo contendere. If a defendant refuses to plead, stands mute, or if a defendant corporation fails to appear, the court shall enter a plea of not guilty.