Alabama Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1, Per Se Violation Conspiracy To Fix Prices — Includes Alternative Rule of Reason Instruction refers to a specific legal instruction provided to juries in Alabama when dealing with cases involving conspiracy to fix prices. This instruction covers the per se violation aspect of such conspiracies and also introduces an alternative approach called the Rule of Reason. In cases where a per se violation of price fixing conspiracy is alleged, the jury is instructed to presume the violation as illegal and anti-competitive. This means that the jury does not need to assess the potential impact on competition or market conditions, recognizing that price fixing agreements are inherently harmful to free and fair economic practices. This instruction underscores the seriousness of price fixing conspiracies and aims to discourage any participation. However, under certain circumstances, an alternative approach called the Rule of Reason is introduced. The Rule of Reason requires analysis beyond a presumption of per se illegality. This means that the jury should consider the potential justifications, efficiencies, or pro-competitive effects of the alleged price fixing agreement before determining whether it violates antitrust laws. It is important to note that Alabama Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1, Per Se Violation Conspiracy To Fix Prices — Includes Alternative Rule of Reason Instruction may not have different types, but variations can exist depending on the specific case details, legal arguments, and evidence presented during a trial. The exact wording and length of the instruction may vary accordingly. Overall, this instruction emphasizes the serious implications of price fixing conspiracies, providing guidance to the jury on how to approach and evaluate such cases with precision, while also recognizing the possibility of alternative analysis through the Rule of Reason approach.