A voluntary participant in a game, sport, or contest, assumes all risks incidental to the particular game, sport, or contest which are obvious and foreseeable. However, he or she does not assume an extraordinary risk which is not normally incident to the game or sport. Even where the assumption of the risk doctrine applies, defendants have a duty to use due care not to increase the risks to a participant over and above those inherent in the sport. While under the doctrine of assumption of risk, a defendant has no legal duty to eliminate or protect a plaintiff from the risks inherent in a sport, but the defendant owes a duty not to increase the inherent risks. To determine whether the primary assumption of risk doctrine applies to a sports participant, the court must decide whether the injury suffered arises from a risk inherent in the sport, and whether imposing a duty might fundamentally alter the nature of the sport.
A person who operates a place of public amusement or entertainment must exercise reasonable care with regard to the construction, maintenance, and management of his buildings or structures and his premises, having regard to the character of entertainment given and the customary conduct of persons attending such entertainment. The operator must employ sufficient personnel to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition. He or she must use ordinary care to maintain the floors and aisles along which patrons are expected to pass in a reasonably safe condition for their use; and this principle has been applied in cases where personal injury resulted from a slippery floor, aisle, ramp or walkway, defective carpet, or the presence of an object the floor or in the aisle.
Title: Arkansas Complaint Against Owner of Golf Course by Patron of Driving Range Struck by Golf Club Keywords: Arkansas, complaint, owner of golf course, patron, driving range, struck by golf club Detailed Description: Introduction: In this article, we will explore a specific type of complaint that may arise in Arkansas involving a patron of a golf driving range being struck by a golf club. We will discuss the potential legal grounds for the complaint, the responsibilities of the golf course owner, and the various types of complaints that may fall under this category. 1. Legal Grounds for Complaint: When a patron is struck by a golf club at a driving range, several legal grounds for complaint may be considered. These can include negligence, lack of proper safety measures, failure to provide a safe environment, or inadequate supervision by the golf course owner or staff. 2. Responsibilities of the Golf Course Owner: The owner of a golf course has a duty to provide a safe environment for all patrons, including those using the driving range. They must properly maintain the facility, regularly inspect for hazards, and ensure sufficient safety measures are in place to minimize the risk of accidents. Failure to fulfill these responsibilities may give rise to a complaint. Types of Complaints against Owner of Golf Course: a) Negligence in Maintaining the Driving Range: Patrons may file a complaint alleging that the golf course owner was negligent in maintaining the driving range. This could include hazards such as broken netting, damaged equipment, or poorly maintained hitting areas, which increase the risk of accidents. b) Insufficient Safety Measures: Complaints may arise if the golf course owner fails to implement necessary safety measures, such as providing sufficient space between each hitting area or failing to install protective barriers to shield patrons from stray golf balls. Inadequate signage warning patrons of potential dangers could also be a basis for complaint. c) Lack of Proper Supervision: If the golf course owner or staff fails to properly supervise the driving range, resulting in an accident, a complaint may be filed. This could include situations where patrons are not given proper instructions on safe behavior or where staff members fail to monitor the range for potential hazards. Conclusion: When a patron of a golf driving range in Arkansas is struck by a golf club, they may have grounds to file a complaint against the owner of the golf course. This complaint can be based on negligence, lack of safety measures, or failure to provide a safe environment. The types of complaints can range from negligence in maintaining the driving range to insufficient safety measures and lack of proper supervision. It is important for golf course owners to fulfill their responsibilities and take appropriate actions to prevent accidents and ensure the safety of patrons.Title: Arkansas Complaint Against Owner of Golf Course by Patron of Driving Range Struck by Golf Club Keywords: Arkansas, complaint, owner of golf course, patron, driving range, struck by golf club Detailed Description: Introduction: In this article, we will explore a specific type of complaint that may arise in Arkansas involving a patron of a golf driving range being struck by a golf club. We will discuss the potential legal grounds for the complaint, the responsibilities of the golf course owner, and the various types of complaints that may fall under this category. 1. Legal Grounds for Complaint: When a patron is struck by a golf club at a driving range, several legal grounds for complaint may be considered. These can include negligence, lack of proper safety measures, failure to provide a safe environment, or inadequate supervision by the golf course owner or staff. 2. Responsibilities of the Golf Course Owner: The owner of a golf course has a duty to provide a safe environment for all patrons, including those using the driving range. They must properly maintain the facility, regularly inspect for hazards, and ensure sufficient safety measures are in place to minimize the risk of accidents. Failure to fulfill these responsibilities may give rise to a complaint. Types of Complaints against Owner of Golf Course: a) Negligence in Maintaining the Driving Range: Patrons may file a complaint alleging that the golf course owner was negligent in maintaining the driving range. This could include hazards such as broken netting, damaged equipment, or poorly maintained hitting areas, which increase the risk of accidents. b) Insufficient Safety Measures: Complaints may arise if the golf course owner fails to implement necessary safety measures, such as providing sufficient space between each hitting area or failing to install protective barriers to shield patrons from stray golf balls. Inadequate signage warning patrons of potential dangers could also be a basis for complaint. c) Lack of Proper Supervision: If the golf course owner or staff fails to properly supervise the driving range, resulting in an accident, a complaint may be filed. This could include situations where patrons are not given proper instructions on safe behavior or where staff members fail to monitor the range for potential hazards. Conclusion: When a patron of a golf driving range in Arkansas is struck by a golf club, they may have grounds to file a complaint against the owner of the golf course. This complaint can be based on negligence, lack of safety measures, or failure to provide a safe environment. The types of complaints can range from negligence in maintaining the driving range to insufficient safety measures and lack of proper supervision. It is important for golf course owners to fulfill their responsibilities and take appropriate actions to prevent accidents and ensure the safety of patrons.
