Arkansas Jury Instruction - 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Basic Civil Claim Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CB-7-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Arkansas Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue Keywords: Arkansas Jury Instruction, Duty to Deliberate, Plaintiff, Defendant, Damages, Trial, Legal Procedure Description: Arkansas Jury Instruction — 7.2 outlines the duty of jurors to deliberate and reach a fair decision when both the plaintiff and the defendant claim damages or when damages are not a contentious issue in a court case. This instruction aims to guide the jury in properly considering the evidence presented during trial and making an informed decision regarding compensation or resolution. When both the plaintiff and the defendant claim damages, the jury must carefully evaluate the evidence and arguments put forth by both sides. They need to consider the credibility of witnesses, the consistency of evidence, and the overall strength of each party's case. The jurors should not be swayed by emotions, personal biases, or sympathy towards either party; their role is to objectively analyze the facts and apply the relevant laws to the case. In cases where damages are not a disputed issue, the jury is still required to deliberate. Their duty is to assess liability and determine other forms of remedy, such as injunctive relief or declaratory judgments. Even if damages are not being claimed, the jury must consider the evidence presented and follow the instructions provided by the court to reach a fair and just decision. Different types of Arkansas Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue may include: 1. Instruction for Damages Dispute: This instruction specifically addresses cases where there is a disagreement between the plaintiff and the defendant regarding the extent or calculation of damages claimed. It provides guidance on assessing evidence, considering expert testimonies, and determining appropriate compensation if liability is established. 2. Instruction for Non-Damages Dispute: This instruction is relevant when damages are not a point of contention in the case. It focuses on the jury's duty to deliberate and determine liability or other forms of remedy, such as injunctions or declaratory judgments. The instruction may provide specific guidelines on evaluating evidence, assessing the credibility of witnesses, and applying relevant laws to the case. Overall, Arkansas Jury Instruction — 7.2 emphasizes the importance of thorough deliberation by the jury and their obligation to arrive at a fair verdict based on the evidence presented. By following these instructions, the jury ensures a just outcome for both the plaintiff and the defendant in cases involving damages or when damages are not at issue.

Arkansas Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue Keywords: Arkansas Jury Instruction, Duty to Deliberate, Plaintiff, Defendant, Damages, Trial, Legal Procedure Description: Arkansas Jury Instruction — 7.2 outlines the duty of jurors to deliberate and reach a fair decision when both the plaintiff and the defendant claim damages or when damages are not a contentious issue in a court case. This instruction aims to guide the jury in properly considering the evidence presented during trial and making an informed decision regarding compensation or resolution. When both the plaintiff and the defendant claim damages, the jury must carefully evaluate the evidence and arguments put forth by both sides. They need to consider the credibility of witnesses, the consistency of evidence, and the overall strength of each party's case. The jurors should not be swayed by emotions, personal biases, or sympathy towards either party; their role is to objectively analyze the facts and apply the relevant laws to the case. In cases where damages are not a disputed issue, the jury is still required to deliberate. Their duty is to assess liability and determine other forms of remedy, such as injunctive relief or declaratory judgments. Even if damages are not being claimed, the jury must consider the evidence presented and follow the instructions provided by the court to reach a fair and just decision. Different types of Arkansas Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue may include: 1. Instruction for Damages Dispute: This instruction specifically addresses cases where there is a disagreement between the plaintiff and the defendant regarding the extent or calculation of damages claimed. It provides guidance on assessing evidence, considering expert testimonies, and determining appropriate compensation if liability is established. 2. Instruction for Non-Damages Dispute: This instruction is relevant when damages are not a point of contention in the case. It focuses on the jury's duty to deliberate and determine liability or other forms of remedy, such as injunctions or declaratory judgments. The instruction may provide specific guidelines on evaluating evidence, assessing the credibility of witnesses, and applying relevant laws to the case. Overall, Arkansas Jury Instruction — 7.2 emphasizes the importance of thorough deliberation by the jury and their obligation to arrive at a fair verdict based on the evidence presented. By following these instructions, the jury ensures a just outcome for both the plaintiff and the defendant in cases involving damages or when damages are not at issue.