The Arkansas Settlement Agreement for Dispute Arising Out of Joint Software Development Agreement where the Developer Continues to Own and License Jointly Developed Software is a legal document that provides a framework for resolving disputes that may arise between parties involved in a joint software development project. This agreement specifically addresses situations wherein the developer retains ownership and licensing rights over the jointly developed software. Key terms: 1. Joint Software Development Agreement: This agreement outlines the terms and conditions under which multiple parties collaborate to develop software. It includes details on the development process, responsibilities, ownership, and licensing arrangements. 2. Developer: The individual or entity responsible for designing, coding, and developing the software. The developer may be one of the parties involved in the joint development agreement. 3. Dispute Resolution: The settlement agreement specifies the procedures and mechanisms to resolve disputes that may arise during the course of software development. It may include negotiation, mediation, or arbitration processes. 4. Ownership and Licensing: The agreement clarifies that the developer shall retain ownership rights over the jointly developed software, as well as the ability to license it to third parties. It may address the terms of the license, such as restrictions, royalties, and usage rights. 5. Intellectual Property Rights: The settlement agreement defines the ownership and protection of intellectual property associated with the jointly developed software. This includes copyrights, patents, and trade secrets. It may outline procedures for protecting and enforcing these rights. Types of Arkansas Settlement Agreements for Disputes Arising Out of Joint Software Development Agreement Where Developer Continues to Own and License Jointly Developed Software: 1. Mediation Settlement Agreement: This type of settlement agreement involves a neutral third party who facilitates negotiations between the involved parties, aiming to reach a mutually agreeable resolution. It may serve as an alternative to litigation and be binding or non-binding, depending on the parties' preferences. 2. Arbitration Settlement Agreement: In this type of settlement agreement, parties agree to submit their dispute to an arbitrator or panel of arbitrators. The arbitrator's decision is generally final and binding, providing a formal alternative to traditional litigation. 3. Litigation Settlement Agreement: This agreement is reached through traditional courtroom proceedings and may occur at any stage of the litigation process. Parties involved in a joint software development dispute may choose to settle their differences before or during a trial, outlining the terms and conditions in a formal settlement agreement. It is important to consult legal professionals to tailor the Arkansas Settlement Agreement to the specific requirements of the joint software development project and the parties involved.