Title: Exploring Arkansas Motion NOV: Types and Detailed Explanation Introduction: Arkansas Motion NOV, also known as Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, is an essential legal concept frequently employed within the state's court system. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of Arkansas Motion NOV, exploring its definition, purpose, and potential types. 1. Definition of Arkansas Motion NOV: Arkansas Motion NOV refers to a post-trial legal motion filed by a party seeking to reverse a jury's verdict in a civil case. It asserts that the jury's decision is not supported by substantial evidence or is contrary to the law, leading to a request to enter a judgment as a matter of law. 2. Purpose of Arkansas Motion NOV: The primary purpose of Arkansas Motion NOV is to allow either party to challenge a jury's verdict by requesting the court to set it aside and enter a judgment in favor of the moving party. This motion is typically filed when the moving party believes that the jury's verdict is improperly grounded or unsupported by substantial evidence. 3. Elements Required for Arkansas Motion NOV: To successfully file an Arkansas Motion NOV, certain elements must be established, including: — The moving party must have been adversely affected by the jury's verdict. — The verdict must be inconsistent or contradictory to the evidence presented at trial. — The verdict must be against the weight of the evidence. — The verdict must be contrary to the law or based on incorrect instructions provided to the jury. 4. Possible Types of Arkansas Motion NOV: While Arkansas law does not explicitly classify different types of Arkansas Motion NOV, it's essential to understand that the motion can be filed by either the plaintiff or the defendant, depending on which party received an unfavorable verdict. However, here are a few possible scenarios where the motion might be employed: a. Arkansas Motion NOV for Insufficient Evidence: This type of motion is filed by a party who believes that the jury's verdict lacks substantial evidence to support it and is thus requesting a judgment in their favor. b. Arkansas Motion NOV for Incorrect Application of Law: In this case, a party contests the jury's verdict, claiming that the verdict is contrary to the law or based on erroneous legal instructions provided to the jury, thereby seeking a judgment in their favor. c. Arkansas Motion NOV for Inconsistent Verdict: When a jury's verdict is inconsistent or contradictory, a party may file a motion requesting the court to set it aside and enter a judgment that aligns with the evidence presented during trial. Conclusion: Arkansas Motion NOV is a powerful legal tool that enables parties to challenge a jury's verdict they believe to be unjustifiable. Whether based on insufficient evidence, incorrect application of law, or an inconsistent verdict, this motion allows parties to seek a judgment in their favor when they believe the jury's decision is flawed. Understanding the nuances of Arkansas Motion NOV enhances one's legal knowledge, empowering them to make informed decisions in civil cases within the state.