In a jury trial jury instructions are given to the jury at the end of the case. These instructions are prepared by the attorneys of both parties and presented to the judge for approval. The instructions tell the jurors what the law is and how to apply the law to the facts that have been proven.
Arizona Instruction to Jury — Essential Factual Elements Necessary to Hold an Instructor, Trainer, or Coach Liable for an Injury to a Participant in a Sports Activity is a set of guidelines used in legal proceedings to determine the liability of an instructor, trainer, or coach for injuries sustained by a participant during a sports activity. These instructions outline the essential elements that need to be proven in order to establish liability. Keywords: Arizona, instruction to jury, essential factual elements, hold liable, instructor, trainer, coach, injury, participant, sports activity. In Arizona, when it comes to determining the liability of an instructor, trainer, or coach for an injury to a participant in a sports activity, there are several essential factual elements that must be proven. These elements are as follows: 1. Duty of Care: The plaintiff must show that the instructor, trainer, or coach had a duty to exercise reasonable care towards the participant's safety during the sports activity. This duty of care is often based on specific standards and guidelines set forth by the governing body of the sport or activity. 2. Breach of Duty: The plaintiff must demonstrate that the instructor, trainer, or coach breached their duty of care by failing to act in accordance with the established standards or guidelines. This breach may involve actions or omissions that fall below the accepted standard of care expected from a reasonably competent instructor, trainer, or coach. 3. Causation: The plaintiff must establish a causal link between the breach of duty and the participant's injury. It must be shown that the instructor, trainer, or coach's actions or omissions directly led to or significantly contributed to the participant's harm. 4. Foreseeability: The plaintiff must demonstrate that the potential for the participant's injury was reasonably foreseeable by the instructor, trainer, or coach. This means that a reasonable person in the same situation would have anticipated the risk of harm and taken appropriate measures to prevent it. 5. Proximate Cause: The plaintiff must prove that the instructor, trainer, or coach's breach of duty was the proximate cause of the participant's injury. Proximate cause refers to the legal concept that the injury was a direct and immediate consequence of the breach, without any intervening events breaking the chain of causation. 6. Damages: The plaintiff must show that the participant suffered actual damages as a result of the injury. This may include medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, or any other quantifiable losses. Different areas and sports activities may have their variations of the Arizona Instruction to Jury — Essential Factual Elements Necessary to Hold an Instructor, Trainer, or Coach Liable for an Injury to a Participant in a Sports Activity. For example, there could be specialized instructions specific to team sports like football or basketball, as well as individual sports such as gymnastics or skateboarding. However, the core elements mentioned above generally apply across various sports activities.
